≈$7.47B Defense-wide DEFINITIVE CONTRACT W58RGZ16C0023

The description says $184.9 million; the contract says $7.47 billion - the record captures only the first step (Boeing)

Defense Contract Management Agency 2016-03-21 〜 2027-08-31

A contract to Boeing awarded by the U.S. Army, obligating about $7.47 billion. The description records an advance procurement of $184,930,000 supporting Lot 7 full-rate production long lead items.

Contract key facts

  • RecipientBoeing
  • Contract value$7,473,242,017 (≈$7.47B)
  • BranchDefense-wide
  • Awarding agencyDepartment of Defense
  • Awarding sub-agencyDefense Contract Management Agency
  • Award typeDEFINITIVE CONTRACT
  • Period of performance2016-03-21 〜 2027-08-31
  • Contract ID (PIID)W58RGZ16C0023

Contract scope (original)

W58RGZ-16-C-0023 IS FOR THE AWARD OF ADVANCE PROCUREMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $184,930,000.00 TO SUPPORT LOT 7 FULL RATE PRODUCTION LONG LEAD ITEMS.

Key points

  • The description records an advance procurement of $184.93 million while the obligated amount is about $7.47 billion - roughly forty times.
  • A description records the content at signature; modifications and additions accumulating later do not appear in it.
  • Taking amounts from the description when processing public data mechanically underestimates scale badly.
  • Amounts come from the amount field; the description is a clue to what the contract is for.
  • Long lead items take a long time between order and delivery and cannot wait for production to start.
  • Of the 207 records this site holds as of 2026-09-02, 23 carry the phrase long lead, totalling about $219.2 billion.

1The amount in the description does not match the contract

The description here concerns an advance procurement of $184.93 million. The obligated amount field reads about $7.47 billion. The gap is roughly forty-fold, and it is not an error.

Amount written in the description$184.93 millionadvance procurement for Lot 7 long lead items
Obligated amountabout $7.47 billionroughly forty times as much
Outlays0as recorded on 2026-09-02

A description records the content at the time the contract was signed; modifications and additions accumulating afterwards do not appear in it. A contract is a living thing, and where scope widens mid-period the obligated amount grows while the wording can stay as first written.

2A trap in reading public data

Reading the description at face valueReading it against the amount field
It feels as though the content is knownIt becomes clear this is only the first step
Amounts get taken from the descriptionAmounts are taken from the field for amounts
Scale is underestimatedThe actual scale is captured

Where public data is processed mechanically, taking the amount from the description would value this record at one fortieth of its size. Amounts come from the amount field; the description is a clue to what the contract is for. The two have to be read differently.

3Advance procurement and long lead items

Long lead items are components that take a long time between order and delivery - engines, airframe structures, certain electronics - which cannot wait for production to start. Advance procurement secures them ahead of the main production contract. Of the 207 defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-09-02, 23 carry the phrase long lead, totalling about $219.2 billion.

How much the length of a production cycle shapes the accumulation of amounts can be read from how widely that phrase appears.

Why it matters

Where public data feeds analysis, a mismatch between description and amount field bears directly on quality. Extracting amounts from descriptions drops what accumulated through modification and understates scale. Large defense contracts frequently run beyond ten years, which makes wording at signature and the current amount especially likely to diverge.

FAQ

Why does the description amount differ from the contract amount?
Because the description records the content at the time of signature, while modifications and additions accumulating afterwards are not reflected in it.
What are long lead items?
Components taking a long time between order and delivery, which cannot wait for production to begin.
Why are outlays zero?
The record gives no reason. In large defense contracts, obligation accumulating first while outlays follow over a long period is widely seen.

Sources (primary)

This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.

#defense contracts#USAspending#long lead items#advance procurement#reading data#Boeing
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.