arXiv Papers

Notable AI research papers, in brief

Selected papers from the preprint server arXiv in AI / machine learning (cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL and more), organized with our own summaries, key points, and sources. This site is not affiliated with arXiv.

This page is a general organization of public research information. Summaries are our own; always verify accuracy and currency with the original paper on arXiv. Includes non-peer-reviewed preprints.

Browse all collected data (list, filter, search) →

Featured

Featured

Notable AI/ML papers explained with our own summaries, key points, FAQs, and sources.

cs.CV 2026/08

The work of visual grounding sits in under 2% of attention heads — masking the top 20 drops grounding accuracy by up to 80 points

A study of the internal mechanism by which vision-language models locate the image region a text prompt refers to. A small subset of attention heads — roughly 1.7 to 2.6% — is causally responsible for grounding, and masking only the top 20 reduces grounding accuracy by up to 80 percentage points, while masking the same number of random heads has little effect.

Read more
cs.CV 2026/08

Removing the scaffolding built to prevent collapse — simplifying video pretraining and cutting its compute several-fold

Self-supervised learning from video has leaned on elaborate scaffolding to stop representations from collapsing to a single answer. This work uses an objective that provably excludes collapse, removes that scaffolding, and reduces the architecture to an encoder and a projector, reporting parity with existing methods at a fraction of the pretraining compute.

Read more
cs.CR 2026/08

Safety does not compose for autonomous agents — against evidence fragmented across iterations, a trajectory-scoped monitor has a true-positive rate equal to its false-positive rate

A study formalizing the problem that widely used safeguards for LLM agents running as autonomous loops are defined over a single trajectory and reset their safety state when the next one begins. Its central result is a separation: against an attack whose evidence spans several iterations, no trajectory-scoped monitor, however expressive, can do better than a true-positive rate equal to its false-positive rate.

Read more
cs.SE 2026/08

What coding agents actually read is not the technical docs — across 557 sessions and 3,033 documentation interactions, six in ten involve instruction files and working notes

A behaviour-grounded study of which documents autonomous coding agents consult, when, and what follows, drawn from 557 agentic coding sessions and 33,097 agentic pull requests. Instruction files and working notes account for 60.5% of all documentation interactions, against 10.6% for classical technical documentation and 1.3% for API references.

Read more
cs.RO 2026/08

A humanoid learning professional tennis form from broadcast video — separating planning from tracking, and closing the real-robot gap with speed adaptation

A framework called AdaPT that teaches humanoid robots professional tennis serving and rally styles directly from broadcast video. Planning and tracking are split into a hierarchy, and the tracking degradation that inevitably appears on real hardware is offset by learning to track randomized execution speeds and by a learned motion-speed adapter.

Read more
cs.CV 2026/08

The computation you can throw away was across views, not across steps — training-free acceleration of 3D texture generation

Putting color and texture onto a 3D surface means running a heavy generator once per viewpoint, which is expensive. Existing acceleration skips denoising steps, but skipping also removes the work that keeps views consistent with each other. This study instead transports updates between geometrically corresponding surface points, with no training required.

Read more
cs.CY 2026/08

Fine-tuning on norms changes how a model justifies itself — from safety compliance to instrumental self-interest, though a system prompt can override it

An experiment starting from the view that normative datasets used to train and align AI carry norms that function as action-guiding patterns rather than neutral moral knowledge. Fine-tuning on the norm-breaking side shifts a model default rationale style from safety compliance toward instrumental self-interest, while system prompts can both suppress and elicit that pattern.

Read more
cs.CV 2026/07

Zero-shot monocular depth in 6.1M parameters — "ZipDepth," lightweight depth for any device (ECCV 2026)

Depth foundation models generalize robustly zero-shot but are too heavy for embedded and mobile platforms; lightweight single-domain alternatives fail silently under domain shift. ZipDepth pairs an efficient reparameterizable encoder-decoder with multi-domain distillation from a foundation model. At 6.1M parameters it runs in real time from server GPUs to power-constrained devices, with the best zero-shot accuracy vs efficiency trade-off among lightweight models on five benchmarks (ECCV 2026).

Read more
cs.CL 2026/07

Testing proactive agents in live Docker containers — UniClawBench, 5 capabilities and 400 tasks

Existing benchmarks for proactive agents lean on sandboxes and single-turn evaluation, mixing capabilities in one task category so failure causes stay hidden. UniClawBench is the first capability-driven benchmark, built around five foundations (skill usage, exploration, long-context reasoning, multimodal understanding, cross-platform coordination). It evaluates 400 bilingual real-world tasks in live Docker containers with step-by-step checkpoints and simulated multi-turn feedback.

Read more
cs.AI 2026/07

"Ideas have genomes" — IG-Bench for scientific lineage reasoning and lineage-grounded idea generation

Scientific ideas rarely start from a blank page: they inherit mechanisms, repair limitations, and recombine earlier work, like genomes. Existing benchmarks say little about whether AI can follow this inheritance. IG-Bench represents each paper as typed, evidence-grounded Idea Genome objects, with a GenomeDiff recording inheritance, mutation, loss, import, and insertion, across 10 domains. The strongest of 14 LLM systems reaches only 27.3% exact accuracy on lineage reasoning — a compositional bottleneck.

Read more
cs.AI 2026/07

AI learning assistants in higher education — a large-scale usage analysis of 77,543 students

A large-scale descriptive analysis of Syntea, an AI-based learning assistant in higher education, based on objective log data from 77,543 distance-learning students. Prior educational-chatbot research relied on small samples and self-reported surveys; large-scale evidence on actual usage was scarce. The study finds Syntea already embedded in the study routines of many learners, with usage differing across gender, age group, study cluster, degree, and study mode.

Read more
cs.AI 2026/07

Measuring whether models can reason about crashes from dashcam video — AUTOPILOT-VQA (CVPR 2026)

Vision-Language Models have improved autonomous-driving tasks, but evaluating whether they reason reliably about safety-critical incidents remains hard. AUTOPILOT-VQA is an incident-centric visual question answering benchmark for dashcam video, built around real driving incidents and near-misses. It covers weather, traffic, road layout, signage, accident occurrence, impact location, and avoidability — moving beyond object recognition toward temporally grounded, safety-aware reasoning (AUTOPILOT CVPR 2026).

Read more
cs.AI 2026/07

A quantized LLM is not the same model — the "Illusion of Equivalency" in quantization effects

Post-training quantization (8-bit down to 2-bit) is standard for deploying LLMs, yet evaluation leans on accuracy and perplexity. This work introduces correctness agreement, a decision-level metric measuring the overlap in correct predictions between a base model and its quantized variants. Behavioral divergence emerges under moderate quantization even when task performance appears preserved; query and key projections are consistently more sensitive than value and output projections.

Read more
cs.LG 2026/07

Training only the "Super Weights" of an LLM fails — importance does not imply trainability (COLM 2026)

LLMs contain Super Weights: parameters whose removal degrades performance by orders of magnitude. This work shows the intuition "if they matter, train them" is wrong. Training them in isolation drops accuracy to random-guessing on OLMo-1B and OLMo-7B, while training equally many random positions instead beats baseline — the collapse comes from targeting Super Weights, not sparsity. Vanilla LoRA succeeds with 0.16% of parameters: importance does not imply trainability in isolation.

Read more
cs.AI 2026/07

An AI that reminds only when it matters — the "Proactive Memory Agent" for long-horizon agents

In long-horizon tasks, decision-relevant state (requirements, environment facts, prior attempts, diagnoses, open subgoals) gets buried in or pushed beyond the context window — a failure mode the authors call behavioral state decay. A separate memory agent runs alongside an unmodified action agent, maintaining a structured memory bank and deciding whether to inject a memory-grounded reminder or stay silent. It lifts pass@1 by +8.3 pp on Terminal-Bench 2.0 and +6.8 pp on tau2-Bench.

Read more
cs.CL 2026/07

You do not need a frontier model to verify citations — calibrating the "judge LLM" for source attribution

Reinforcement learning increasingly uses a judge LLM to score rubric criteria, acting as the reward model. Before trusting that signal, we must know how capable and biased the judge is. On citation quality in deep-research systems, the authors score 8 off-the-shelf judges over 1,248 human-reviewed decisions and find cheaper judges stay competitive. But at equal F1, judges differ sharply in pass-rate drift and false-positive/negative rates — directional bias that scalar F1 hides and an RL loop amplifies.

Read more
cs.SE 2026/07

Retrieving code by "how it is done" — ProjAgent and procedural similarity for repository-level code generation

Repository-level code generation must implement a target function amid cross-file dependencies and project conventions. Existing retrieval relies on lexical, structural, or semantic similarity, missing functions with similar procedural logic. ProjAgent adds procedural similarity as an explicit signal: it decomposes the target into steps, retrieves similar procedures per step, merges them with semantic retrieval, and repairs code via static analysis — reaching 41.14% Pass@1 on REPOCOD.

Read more
Browse by field

Explore by AI/ML field

Browse collected papers by arXiv category (cs.LG = machine learning, cs.CV = computer vision, and more), newest first. The number shows how many we have collected.

Latest feed

Recent AI/ML papers — latest 40

New papers in AI-related categories, newest submission first. Each links to the original page on arXiv.

  1. 1
    Sep 17, 2026
  2. 2
    Sep 17, 2026
  3. 3
    Sep 17, 2026
  4. 4
    Sep 17, 2026
  5. 5
    Sep 17, 2026
  6. 6
    Sep 17, 2026
  7. 7
    Sep 17, 2026
  8. 8
    Sep 17, 2026
  9. 9
    Sep 17, 2026
  10. 10
    Sep 17, 2026
  11. 11
    Sep 17, 2026
  12. 12
    Sep 17, 2026
  13. 13
    Sep 17, 2026
  14. 14
    Sep 17, 2026
  15. 15
    Sep 17, 2026
  16. 16
    Sep 17, 2026
  17. 17
    Sep 17, 2026
  18. 18
    Sep 17, 2026
  19. 19
    Sep 17, 2026
  20. 20
    Sep 17, 2026
  21. 21
    Sep 17, 2026
  22. 22
    Sep 17, 2026
  23. 23
    Sep 17, 2026
  24. 24
    Sep 17, 2026
  25. 25
    Sep 17, 2026
  26. 26
    Sep 17, 2026
  27. 27
    Sep 17, 2026
  28. 28
    Sep 17, 2026
  29. 29
    Sep 17, 2026
  30. 30
    Sep 17, 2026
  31. 31
    Sep 17, 2026
  32. 32
    Sep 17, 2026
  33. 33
    Sep 17, 2026
  34. 34
    Sep 17, 2026
  35. 35
    Sep 17, 2026
  36. 36
    Sep 17, 2026
  37. 37
    Sep 17, 2026
  38. 38
    Sep 17, 2026
  39. 39
    Sep 17, 2026
  40. 40
    Sep 17, 2026

Source: arXiv (descriptive metadata is CC0 public domain). Summaries are our own; see arXiv for the original text and PDF.

Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.