Vehicles at ~$6.1B: buying, refurbishing and storing bundled into one contract (Oshkosh Defense, Army)
The U.S. Army awarded Oshkosh Defense a contract covering vehicles, trailers and kits, plus vehicle refurbishment, storage and maintenance, and a full technical data package. The value is about $6.10 billion. How pricing is split within a single contract — firm fixed price versus cost reimbursement — shows how this kind of procurement is designed.
Contract key facts
- RecipientOSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC
- Contract value$6,104,208,871 (≈$6.1B)
- BranchArmy
- Awarding agencyDepartment of Defense
- Awarding sub-agencyDepartment of the Army
- Award typeDEFINITIVE CONTRACT
- Period of performance2015-08-25 〜 2025-09-25
- Contract ID (PIID)W56HZV15C0095
Contract scope (original)
THE CONTRACT INCLUDES FIRM FIXED PRICE (FFP) CONTACT LINE ITEM NUMBERS (CLIN) FOR VEHICLES, TRAILERS, KITS (PACKAGED AND INSTALLED), TEST HARDWARE AND SUPPORT, VEHICLE REFURBISHMENT, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING/ PROGRAM MANAGEMENT (SEPM), STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE OF VEHICLES, VEHICLE REFURBISHMENT, INTEGRATED PRODUCT SUPPORT (IPS), AND A TECHNICAL DATA PACKAGE (TDP). THE CONTRACT ALSO INCLUDES COST PLUS FIXED FEE (CPFF) CLINS FOR SYSTEM TECHNICAL SUPPORT (STS), TOTAL PACKAGE FIELDING (TPF), AND INTERIM CONTRACTOR SUPPORT (ICS). THE CONTRACT CONTAINS PROVISIONS FOR AN ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (EPA) FOR MATERIAL FLUCTUATIONS FOR THE VEHICLES PROCURED IN OPTION PERIODS SIX, SEVEN, AND EIGHT.
Key points
- The Army awarded Oshkosh Defense a contract valued at about $6.10 billion ($6,104,208,871 cumulative), running August 2015 to September 2025.
- Scope covers vehicles, trailers, and kits plus refurbishment, storage and maintenance, SEPM, integrated product support, and a technical data package.
- Pricing is split by line item: firm fixed price where specification is settled, cost plus fixed fee where the workload is hard to judge in advance.
- Vehicles in option periods six, seven, and eight carry an economic price adjustment clause for material fluctuations.
- Recorded outlays in this data are about $605.12 million, but public outlay fields can be incomplete and cannot be read as an execution rate.
- Firm fixed price puts overrun risk on the contractor and cost-plus on the government, with economic price adjustment on the option-year vehicles.
1More than buying is packed into one contract
The scope of this contract is long because the object is not only vehicles. What is listed runs from vehicles and trailers and installed kits and test hardware through vehicle refurbishment, storage and maintenance, engineering and program management, integrated product support, and a technical data package — buying, repairing, keeping, and receiving the drawings, in one continuous line.
Equipment is not ordered as a delivery and done; the arrangements for keeping it in service are ordered with it.
2Firm fixed price and cost reimbursement, side by side
The other thing readable here is that pricing differs by line item. Where specification and quantity are settled — vehicles, kits — the item sits at firm fixed price. Where the amount of work is hard to judge in advance — technical support, fielding support to units — it sits at cost plus fixed fee. The first puts the risk of overrun on the contractor, the second on the government.
Vehicles procured in the later option periods additionally carry an economic price adjustment clause that passes material price movement into the price, a design that assumes steel and similar inputs will move over a long contract.
3Contract value against recorded outlays
The contract value is about $6.10 billion and recorded outlays in this data are about $605.12 million. Public outlay fields can be incompletely recorded depending on the age of the contract and the reporting route, so the ratio between those two figures cannot be read as an execution rate. This site states both only as recorded values.
4Pricing methods divide inside one contract
What this contract shows is that the way price is set differs item by item. What is being bought determines whether cost can be foreseen, and that in turn determines who carries the risk.
| Pricing method | Applied to | Who carries cost overrun |
|---|---|---|
| Firm fixed price (FFP) | Vehicles and kits, where specification and quantity are settled | The contractor |
| Cost plus fixed fee (CPFF) | Engineering and fielding support, where the volume of work is hard to foresee | The government |
| Economic price adjustment (EPA) | Vehicles procured in the option years | Material price movement passes into the price |
The scope further lists vehicles and trailers, kits to be fitted, test hardware, vehicle reset, storage and maintenance, engineering management, integrated product support and the technical data package — buying, repairing, storing and receiving the drawings, all in one line. The allocation of risk in a decade-long procurement appears here as the structure of the contract itself.
Why it matters
Bundling procurement with subsequent maintenance, storage, and technical support gives the contractor a long revenue base while shifting how risk is held line by line. The more of the value sits at firm fixed price, the more profit depends on the accuracy of material and labor estimates. Reading down to the line items in the public scope text gives a way to infer what risk distribution the headline figure is made of.
FAQ
What data is this?
Is the amount final?
What is the difference between FFP and CPFF?
What is an EPA clause?
Sources (primary)
This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.
- USAspending (award details)
- Contract ID (PIID):W56HZV15C0095