≈$2.1M DELIVERY ORDER 12314426F0311

$2.1M to finish an AI grading system for use in the field — a Phase III commercialization award (USDA)

Department of Agriculture 2026-08-14 〜 2027-08-13

The U.S. Department of Agriculture awarded Ensemble Government Services $2.1 million to bring an AI grading system to a state where it can actually be used in the field. The work spans model development, software integration, hardware configuration, performance validation, and deployment — Phase III, the step from research into commercialization.

Contract key facts

  • RecipientENSEMBLE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC
  • Contract value$2,100,000 (≈$2.1M)
  • Awarding agencyDepartment of Agriculture
  • Awarding sub-agencyOffice of the Chief Financial Officer
  • Award typeDELIVERY ORDER
  • Period of performance2026-08-14 〜 2027-08-13
  • Contract ID (PIID)12314426F0311

Contract scope (original)

THIS NEW CONTRACT OF PHASE III WILL COMPLETE THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL DEVELOPMENT, SOFTWARE INTEGRATION, HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, PERFORMANCE VALIDATION, AND DEPLOYMENT ACTIVITIES REQUIRED TO PRODUCE A FULLY FUNCTIONAL, FIELD READY GRADING SY

Key points

  • The USDA Office of the Chief Financial Officer awarded Ensemble Government Services $2,100,000.
  • The scope is bringing an AI grading system to a "fully functional, field ready" state — a Phase III contract.
  • Work covered: model development, software integration, hardware configuration, performance validation, deployment.
  • Phase III names the commercialization and fielding stage in the U.S. small-business research and development framework.
  • Period August 14, 2026 to August 13, 2027. The commodities and criteria cannot be confirmed — the record is truncated.
  • Of the 222 federal spending records this site holds as of 2026-09-01, FY2024 leads with 54 by start year, and more than half fall in the last three years.

1What "grading" is doing

The United States has long operated systems that assign grades to agricultural products and meat. Behind the labels a shopper sees lies the work of applying defined criteria, performed by people. That judgment takes expertise and has carried persistent problems: variation between graders and the difficulty of staffing the work at all.

The motive for bringing in automation built on image recognition is clear — holding the application of criteria steady, and raising throughput.

2Phase III is where research moves to the field

Phase III in the scope names a stage in the U.S. small-business research and development framework. Phase I establishes feasibility, Phase II builds and demonstrates a prototype, and Phase III moves to commercialization and fielding.

The work this contract lists — model development, software integration, hardware configuration, performance validation, deployment — is precisely the process of turning something that works into something usable on site. That this stage arrives as a procurement contract rather than research funding is what characterizes Phase III.

3The condition "fully functional, field ready"

The scope states its completion condition as fully functional and field ready. Achieving accuracy in a lab is not the same as running stably under the lighting, speed, soil, and vibration of a working facility. Performance validation and hardware configuration appear in one contract because closing that gap is the work. The specific commodities and the criteria being judged cannot be confirmed, since the record is truncated.

4The fiscal years the records fall in

Sorting the 222 federal spending records this site holds as of 2026-09-01 by the fiscal year in which the contract began gives FY2024 the most at 54, then FY2025 at 43 and FY2026 at 36. Further back, FY2020 has 27 and FY2023 has 26.

FY202454 / 222
FY202543 / 222
FY202636 / 222
FY202027 / 222
FY202326 / 222

More than half fall in the last three years. That points to procurement touching AI having grown recently, and equally to this site's collection being thickest over that period. The run of counts cannot be read straight off as the movement of a market.

Why it matters

The cost of deploying AI weights toward the surrounding work of running reliably under real conditions rather than the model itself. Contracts where hardware configuration and performance validation appear together show that process actually being procured. For a company, research-stage funding and deployment-stage contracts are different money, and being able to design a path through both is what separates commercialization from demonstration.

FAQ

What is agricultural grading?
Assigning grades to agricultural products and meat against defined criteria. The judgment takes expertise and has carried problems of variation between graders and of staffing the work.
What stage is Phase III?
In the U.S. small-business research and development framework, the stage after Phase I feasibility and Phase II prototyping and demonstration — moving to commercialization and fielding.
Which commodities are covered?
The recorded scope is truncated, so the commodities and the specific criteria cannot be confirmed. This site does not write beyond what is recorded.

Sources (primary)

This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.

#Federal spending#AI#USDA#Agriculture#Computer vision#SBIR#Federal contracts
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.