H.R. 7576 House Bill 119th Congress

AI Workforce Training Act (H.R.7576) — a new section of the Internal Revenue Code giving a credit of 30 percent of employee AI training costs, capped at $2,500 per employee a year

U.S. House Latest update Feb 13, 2026

A House bill adding section 45BB to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, allowing a credit equal to 30 percent of qualified AI training expenses. The credit is capped at $2,500 per employee per taxable year and indexed for inflation for years beginning after 2026. Qualifying costs cover not only tuition but wages during attendance and the cost of in-house training.

Bill overview (primary data)

  • Bill numberH.R. 7576
  • TypeHouse Bill
  • Congress119th Congress
  • Latest actionReferred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.(2026-02-13)

Key points

  • Adds section 45BB to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, a credit equal to 30 percent of qualified AI training expenses.
  • The credit is capped at $2,500 per employee per year and indexed for inflation for years beginning after 2026.
  • Qualifying costs are program enrollment or attendance, the wages of the employee while attending, and in-house training development.
  • Prompt engineering, data literacy, machine learning fundamentals and AI ethics are named as examples of accredited programs.
  • Double benefit is denied for the same expenses under any other credit or deduction.
  • The credit is 30 percent of cost capped at $2,500 per employee a year, reached at about $8,333 of training cost.

1A tax credit rather than a grant

Spreading AI skills can be approached by funding training providers or by standing up public courses. What this bill reaches for is a tax credit, letting a firm subtract part of what it paid for training from what it owes.

The insertion point is the Internal Revenue Code, as a new section 45BB. Nothing is handed out; the tax burden of the firm that spent the money is reduced. Administration falls to the tax authority, and no mechanism for vetting the content of training is set up.

2Wages and in-house training are inside the definition

Three kinds of cost qualify: expenses for enrollment or attendance at an accredited training program, the wages of the employee while attending, and the cost of developing or providing training in house.

Covering tuition alone would leave the burden with firms that give up working hours for learning. Including wages treats the cost of that time as part of the training. Including in-house development allows for arrangements that do not lean on outside courses. Prompt engineering, data literacy, machine learning fundamentals and AI ethics are named as examples of accredited programs.

3The cap is $2,500 per employee

The credit is 30 percent of the cost, capped at $2,500 per employee a year. The cap binds once training costs reach about $8,333, beyond which nothing further qualifies. For taxable years beginning after 2026 the cap rises with a cost-of-living adjustment.

Of the 114 AI-related bills this site holds as of 2026-09-01, among the 50 not yet covered, 12 amend an existing statute, two of them the Internal Revenue Code, this bill among them. The same aim of spreading AI skills becomes an allowable use of grant money when inserted into education law and a credit when inserted into tax law. Which statute is chosen shapes the policy itself.

4The cap is reached at about $8,333 of training cost

The bill lets a company deduct part of the training cost it paid from its tax. With a rate and a cap set, where it tops out can be calculated.

Rate of credit30 percent of costagainst training expenditure the employer paid
Cap per employee$2,500 a yearreached at about $8,333 of training cost
Tax years after 2026The cap rises with a cost-of-living adjustment

Three kinds of cost qualify: enrolling in and attending a qualified training programme, the wages of the employee while attending, and developing or delivering AI training internally. Covering only tuition would leave the burden with employers who release staff during working hours. Including wages treats the cost of that time as part of the training.

Why it matters

Returning training costs through tax assumes firms choose and spend on their own. A cap of $2,500 per employee points at short courses and in-house sessions rather than long programmes. Including wages bears directly on whether a firm lets people learn during working hours.

FAQ

Who takes the credit?
The business that paid the training costs. Thirty percent of the cost comes off the tax owed, capped at $2,500 per employee a year.
Does anything beyond tuition qualify?
Yes. Wages during attendance and the cost of developing or providing training in house both qualify.
Is the content of training vetted?
The text sets up no vetting mechanism. What it requires is that the program be an accredited one.

Sources (primary)

Source: Congress.gov (Library of Congress; U.S. legislative materials, public domain). Links go to the official site.

#Congress#Bills#AI#Taxation#Workforce
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.