China AI Power Report Act (H.R.6275): mandating a government report assessing China AI capabilities — cleared committee 47-0
H.R.6275, the "China AI Power Report Act," is a House bill whose purpose is to require a government report assessing China artificial-intelligence (AI) capabilities. Against the backdrop of U.S.-China AI competition, it cleared committee with bipartisan support by a 47-0 vote (ordered to be reported, as amended). The sponsor is Del. James Moylan (R-GU).
Bill overview (primary data)
- Bill numberH.R. 6275
- TypeHouse Bill
- Congress119th Congress
- Latest actionOrdered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 47 - 0.（2026-01-21）
Key points
- A House bill (H.R.6275) whose purpose is to require a government report assessing China artificial-intelligence (AI) capabilities.
- Backdrop: a U.S.-China relationship treating AI as central to strategic competition; a systematic grasp of the rival strength underpins security and technology policy.
- Introduced November 21, 2025; on January 21, 2026, ordered to be reported, as amended, by 47-0 (bipartisan committee clearance).
- Sponsor Del. James Moylan (R-GU).
- The specifics of the report content and responsible agency are outside this summary; no firm conclusions are drawn.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has come to be seen as a strategic technology that shapes not only the economy but the course of national security. Between the United States and China in particular, competition over AI development capacity, talent, computing resources, and applications has become a key point of contention between nations.
Accurately grasping how far the other side has come is essential to policy, and relying on fragmentary information risks misjudgment.
H.R.6275, the China AI Power Report Act, is a House bill that seeks to address that. As the name indicates, its purpose appears to be requiring a government report assessing China AI capabilities. Per the recorded history, it was introduced on November 21, 2025, and on January 21, 2026, the committee ordered it to be reported, as amended, by 47-0.
That near-unanimous margin shows the need to understand China AI is shared across party lines. The sponsor is Del. James Moylan (R-GU). What the report should include and which body would carry it out are provision details beyond the information here, so no firm conclusions are drawn.
A report systematically assessing another country technological strength forms the basis for a chain of policy decisions, from export controls and investment screening to research collaboration and resource allocation. In a field like AI that advances quickly and is broadly dual-use, such ongoing assessment is especially valuable.
That this bill cleared committee on a bipartisan basis reflects, in part, a direction in U.S. AI policy that prioritizes making competitors visible. The facts to hold onto are the bill purpose (an assessment report on China AI) and its current procedural stage (cleared committee 47-0).
Why it matters
A report systematically assessing a rival AI capability underpins policy decisions such as export controls, investment screening, research collaboration, and resource allocation. For companies tied to U.S.-China technology competition (semiconductors, cloud, AI-model development), such assessments can be a clue to the direction of future regulation or trade measures (this summary organizes purpose and procedural stage, not the report content).
FAQ
What does this bill require?
What does "reported 47-0" mean?
Sources (primary)
Source: Congress.gov (Library of Congress; U.S. legislative materials, public domain). Links go to the official site.
- Congress.gov (bill page, original)
- H.R. 6275（119th Congress）