Medical-AI trial: how do people with mental illness use AI chatbots for mental health? a survey of use, expectations, and concerns (NCT07658547)
An online observational survey of how adults in psychiatric or psychotherapeutic treatment use, perceive, and evaluate generative-AI chatbots for mental-health purposes, asking about usage patterns, expectations, experiences, perceived benefits, barriers, and concerns. The primary outcome is the percentage who have used generative AI for mental-health issues. 150 participants.
Trial overview (primary data)
- StatusEnrolling by invitation
- ConditionsSevere Mental Illness
- SponsorMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane
- Target enrollment150 participants
- Period2026-06-01 〜 2026-11-01
Key points
- An online observational survey of how adults in psychiatric or psychotherapeutic treatment use, perceive, and evaluate generative-AI chatbots for mental health.
- It asks about usage patterns, expectations, experiences, perceived benefits, barriers, and concerns.
- The primary outcome is the percentage who have used generative AI for mental-health issues. 150 participants, by invitation.
- Its strength is capturing reality from those directly affected; the backdrop is convenience alongside safety, crisis-handling, and privacy concerns.
- A survey describing use and perceptions; it does not evaluate or establish therapeutic effect or safety.
- Being easy and always available is the reason both for widened access and for concerns about misinformation and dependence.
1When generative AI becomes a confidant
Generative-AI chatbots such as ChatGPT have quickly become a familiar partner for talking through worries and gathering information. In mental health too, some people use AI to voice concerns such as sleeplessness or anxiety. Alongside the convenience of an always-available listener, concerns are raised about wrong advice, crisis handling, and privacy.
So how do people actually in psychiatric treatment use AI chatbots, and how do they feel about them? This survey captures that from the voices of those directly affected.
2How adults in treatment actually use it
Per the registry summary, this observational study surveys adults receiving psychiatric or psychotherapeutic treatment about how they use, perceive, and evaluate generative-AI chatbots for mental-health purposes.
It asks about usage patterns, expectations, experiences, perceived benefits, barriers, and concerns, with the main questions being how people with mental disorders use AI chatbots in the context of their mental health and what expectations, attitudes, and experiences they hold. The primary outcome is the percentage who have used generative AI for mental-health issues.
Participants provide electronic informed consent; the size is 150, conducted by invitation.
3The same ease works both ways
Using AI chatbots for mental health holds together the possibility of widening access and concerns about safety. The same property gives rise to both.
Capturing how people actually living with mental illness use these tools, what they want and what worries them — not only the specialist view — is the foundation for safe guidelines and support design. The primary endpoint is the proportion who have used generative AI for a mental health concern, across 150 participants.
Why it matters
Mental-health use of AI chatbots is a debated area where potential to widen access coexists with concerns about safety, dependence, and misinformation. Surveying the actual use and perceptions of those affected is a foundation for safe guidelines and support design (this study describes use, not therapeutic effect or safety).
FAQ
Is this a study that treats people with AI?
Why is surveying patients important?
Sources (primary)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (U.S. NIH/NLM, public domain). This site does not provide medical advice. Verify the latest and exact details with the official source. This site is not endorsed or certified by the NIH/NLM.
- ClinicalTrials.gov (study record, original)
- NCT ID: NCT07658547