Recruiting NA INTERVENTIONAL NCT06806163

Medical-AI trial: predicting overdose risk with machine learning and nudging safer prescribing in the EHR — curbing opioid overdose (cluster-randomized) (NCT06806163)

University of Pittsburgh Updated 2026-06-17

A cluster-randomized trial of a clinician-targeted behavioral nudge in the electronic health record (EHR) for patients flagged by a machine-learning model as at elevated risk of opioid overdose. It compares a risk flag alone, a flag plus nudges, and usual care. The primary outcome is a prescribing-practices composite score. 1,350 patients; recruiting.

Trial overview (primary data)

  • StatusRecruiting
  • ConditionsOpioid Overdose, Opioid Use, Opioid Use Disorder, Opioids
  • InterventionsBEHAVIORAL: EHR-Embedded Elevated-Risk Flag, BEHAVIORAL: EHR-Embedded Elevated-Risk Flag with Behavioral Nudges, BEHAVIORAL: Usual Care
  • SponsorUniversity of Pittsburgh
  • Target enrollment1,350 participants
  • Period2025-03-10 〜 2027-02-01

Key points

  • A cluster-randomized trial of a clinician-targeted EHR behavioral nudge for patients flagged by a machine-learning model as at elevated risk of opioid overdose.
  • It compares a risk flag alone, a flag plus nudges (best practice alerts), and usual care.
  • The main goals are improving opioid prescribing safety and reducing overdose risk. The primary outcome is a prescribing-practices composite score.
  • The design links AI prediction to physician action, the heart of AI implementation: from prediction to action.
  • 1,350 patients; recruiting. An evaluation by prescribing practices, not an establishment of overdose-death reduction or model effectiveness.

Opioid (strong painkiller) overdose is a serious public-health crisis in the United States. Who carries risk depends on many factors, such as history, co-prescriptions, and the course of prescribing, and it is easily missed in a busy clinic. If machine learning (ML) can predict high-risk patients from past data and deliver that to the physician, prescribing might be made safer. This study tests such a mechanism.

Per the registry summary, this cluster-randomized controlled trial tries a clinician-targeted behavioral nudge in the EHR for patients the ML model flags as at elevated risk of opioid overdose. Specifically, it provides a flag in the EHR for high-risk individuals, with and without behavioral nudges (best practice alerts, BPAs), compared with usual care by primary care clinicians.

The main goals are to improve opioid prescribing safety and reduce overdose risk, and the primary outcome is a prescribing-practices composite score. The size is 1,350, and it is recruiting.

What is distinctive is that the design covers not only the AI prediction but how that prediction connects to physician action. A prediction that does not change prescribing is meaningless. Combining a behavioral nudge, a gentle push toward the desired choice rather than a mandate, and comparing flag-alone with flag-plus-nudge gets at the heart of AI implementation: from prediction to action.

That said, this study evaluates effectiveness by prescribing practices and the like; it does not establish a reduction in overdose deaths or the effectiveness of the model. Prediction indicates a level of risk, and individual decisions rest with the physician.

Why it matters

The core is covering not just AI prediction but how it connects to physician action. A prediction that does not change prescribing is meaningless; combining a behavioral nudge and comparing flag-alone with flag-plus-nudge gets at from prediction to action (this study evaluates prescribing practices, not an establishment of overdose-death reduction).

FAQ

What is a nudge?
A behavioral-science method that gently pushes toward a desired choice rather than mandating it. Here it is used as an EHR alert (best practice alert) that informs the clinician of risk and encourages safer prescribing.
Does the AI decide prescribing?
No. The AI predicts a level of risk and informs the physician; prescribing decisions rest with the physician. This study evaluates whether that mechanism improves prescribing safety.

Sources (primary)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (U.S. NIH/NLM, public domain). This site does not provide medical advice. Verify the latest and exact details with the official source. This site is not endorsed or certified by the NIH/NLM.

#Medical AI#Clinical trial#Machine learning#Opioids#Public health#Electronic health record
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.