Recruiting OBSERVATIONAL NCT07144319

Before AI reaches blue-light cystoscopy for bladder cancer — an observational study that registers the collection of training data itself (NCT07144319)

Photocure Updated 2026-09-04

An observational study that gathers video and image recordings together with clinical data from blue light cystoscopy (BLC) performed in routine care, in order to build a training dataset for a real-time lesion detection (CADe) algorithm. Planned enrollment 500; the sponsor is a company (Photocure).

Trial overview (primary data)

  • StatusRecruiting
  • ConditionsBladder Cancer, Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
  • SponsorPhotocure
  • Target enrollment500 participants
  • Period2026-03-25 〜 2027-12-01

Key points

  • The purpose is not to evaluate algorithm performance but to build a training dataset for real-time lesion detection (CADe).
  • An observational study gathering video and image recordings with relevant clinical data from blue light cystoscopy performed in routine care.
  • The record states that assessment during cystoscopy is subjective with large operator variability, leaving room for computer-aided detection.
  • The data supports training, non-clinical technical development and testing, and also the documentation needed for training and the design of future validation.
  • Planned enrollment 500, industry-sponsored. Only 61 of the 750 medical-AI trials this site holds as of 2026-08-28 — 8.1 percent — are industry-led.
  • Of the 803 trials held as of 2026-09-01, 65 are industry-led while universities and hospitals account for 702.

1Not a trial that evaluates an AI, but one that builds it

The phrase medical-AI clinical trial usually calls to mind measuring the performance of a finished system. This study sits one step earlier. Its purpose is to gather video and images from blue light cystoscopy performed in routine care, along with the matching clinical data, and assemble a training dataset. There is no algorithm yet, and so no performance to evaluate.

Medical AI depends first on data that is high in quality and diverse, and what marks this record is that the sourcing of that data has been registered as clinical research in its own right.

2Turning a subjective procedure into something measurable

The record states frankly that assessment during cystoscopy is subjective and carries large operator variability. Blue light makes lesions stand out, but the decisions about where to biopsy and what to remove remain with the human eye. The point of adding computer-aided detection is therefore not to win a contest over visibility; it is to narrow the spread in judgment between operators.

That the stated purposes extend to guiding how future validation should be designed suggests the regulatory path beyond data collection is already in view.

3Industry sponsors account for only 8 percent

Of the 750 medical-AI clinical trials this site holds as of 2026-08-28, 618.1 percent — are led by industry. Universities and hospitals lead 655 of them, or 87 percent, while government bodies and the National Institutes of Health account for 24 and 8 respectively. Clinical evaluation of medical AI is overwhelmingly academic, and a company starting from the collection of training data, as here, is in the minority.

What performance target the algorithm aims for, and when it would move to a validation stage, are not part of this registry record.

4Who is evaluating medical AI clinically

This study is a case of a company starting from the collection of training data. Splitting the trials this site holds by the class of the lead sponsor places it.

Universities and hospitals (OTHER)702 / 803
Industry65 / 803
Other government26 / 803
NIH8 / 803

That is the breakdown across the 803 medical AI trials this site holds as of 2026-09-01. Clinical evaluation of medical AI proceeds overwhelmingly under academic leadership. The purpose here is to collect video, images and corresponding clinical data from blue-light cystoscopy performed in routine care and build a training dataset. There is as yet no algorithm and no performance to evaluate.

Why it matters

The performance of an AI is set by the quality and diversity of its training data, yet how that data is sourced rarely surfaces. Registering the collection itself as clinical research, with documentation and future validation design among the stated purposes, is one example of a route for developing a regulated medical AI.

FAQ

Does this study apply a new treatment or AI to patients?
No. The record describes an observational study gathering video, images and clinical data from blue light cystoscopy performed as routine care. The algorithm is still to be trained.
What is blue light cystoscopy?
A procedure using a drug that induces fluorescence under blue light preferentially in neoplastic and malignant cells, making bladder lesions easier to see. The record states it has been shown to improve detection of bladder cancer.
Why register data collection as clinical research?
The record states the data will support not only training and non-clinical development but also the documentation needed for training and the design of future validation. It does not state the reason itself.

Sources (primary)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (U.S. NIH/NLM, public domain). This site does not provide medical advice. Verify the latest and exact details with the official source. This site is not endorsed or certified by the NIH/NLM.

#Clinical trials#AI#Healthcare#Urology#Endoscopy
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.