Class II Medical Device Z-2218-2026 Ongoing

Sterile barrier breach in a cardiac surgery cannula (Z-2218-2026) — what fails is not the product but the assurance around it

Medtronic Perfusion Systems Reported May 27, 2026

A vascular catheter used in cardiopulmonary bypass recalled because certain lots have the potential for a sterile barrier breach. The quantity is 2,620 units and distribution spans the United States and more than thirty other countries.

Recall overview (primary data)

  • ClassificationClass II
  • Product typeMedical Device
  • Recalling firmMedtronic Perfusion Systems
  • ReasonCertain lots of product have the potential for a sterile barrier breach.
  • DistributionWorldwide distribution - US Nationwide and the countries of Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Denmark, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Latvia...
  • Recall initiated2026-04-21

Key points

  • A cardiopulmonary bypass catheter was recalled because certain lots have the potential for a sterile barrier breach.
  • The issue is not a defect in the product but the loss of the assurance held by the packaging.
  • Opening the packaging to check would end its sterility, so the response is a recall by lot.
  • Across the unpublished records this site holds as of 2026-09-04, 203 cite sterility, the most numerous class.
  • The quantity is 2,620 units with distribution across the United States and more than thirty other countries.

1Not the contents but the wrapping

The reason is not a defect in the product itself. It is that the sterile barrier — the packaging that holds a sterilized state — has the potential to be breached. An instrument entering the body presumes sterility, and the packaging is what assures it. Breached, the premise falls away.

A defect in the productA breach of the sterile barrier
Design or materials are at faultNothing is wrong with the product itself
It will not perform as intendedIt will perform, but sterility is not assured
Replacement settles itOpening it to check ends its sterility then and there

That last line is what makes this class difficult. Opening the packaging to see whether it is breached leaves the product no longer sterile. Checking and spoiling are the same act, which is why the response is to recall by lot.

2How common sterility recalls are

Unpublished records this site holds as of 2026-09-041,331Out of 1,408 recall records in total
Those citing sterility at that date203The most numerous reason among them
Devices overall137 Class I and 642 Class IIAcross all 1,408 records this site holds as of 2026-09-04

Tallying the reason text across the unpublished records this site holds as of 2026-09-04, 203 mention sterility or sterilization, the most numerous class. For instruments entering the body or delivering medication into it, being sterile is a condition prior to function itself.

3Distribution scattered worldwide

The distribution field lists more than thirty countries. Devices are sold under each country regulation while manufacturing is often concentrated, so one lot scatters across the world. Notice of a recall reaches through each national distribution network in stages, and halting stock is done separately wherever it lands.

The records this site holds also include recalls confined to a single state, so the same format spans a wide range of scale.

4Why Class II

This is classified Class II. A non-sterile instrument entering the body could have serious consequences, yet classification turns on the harm judged likely to follow. That the breach is a potential rather than an established one, and that packaging condition is checked before use in practice, appear to enter that judgment.

Why it matters

Where assurance rests on packaging, the act of verifying destroys what it verifies, so decisions run by lot rather than by unit. Manufacturing concentrates while distribution scatters, so notice and stock holds proceed in stages.

FAQ

Why recall a whole lot rather than check?
Opening the packaging to check leaves the product no longer sterile. Checking and spoiling are the same act.
Why is it Class II?
Classification turns on the harm judged likely to follow. That the breach is a potential rather than established appears to enter the judgment.

Sources (primary)

Source: openFDA (U.S. FDA, CC0 public domain). Data is provided as-is and must not be used for medical decisions. Verify the latest and exact details with the official FDA recall information. This site is not endorsed or certified by the U.S. FDA.

#FDA#Recalls#Medical devices#Sterility#Catheters
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.