Building for the U.S. and for foreign governments under one contract — foreign military sales inside a $4.6 billion PAC-3 award
An Army contract with Lockheed Martin carrying an obligated value of about $4.583 billion. The description states FY19/20 US/FMS requirements, showing that procurement for U.S. forces and for foreign governments is gathered into a single contract.
Contract key facts
- RecipientLockheed Martin
- Contract value$4,583,057,419 (≈$4.58B)
- BranchArmy
- Awarding agencyDepartment of Defense
- Awarding sub-agencyDepartment of the Army
- Award typeDEFINITIVE CONTRACT
- Period of performance2018-12-21 〜 2027-03-31
- Contract ID (PIID)W31P4Q19C0011
Contract scope (original)
W31P4Q-19-C-0011 PAC-3 PRODUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE FY19/20 US/FMS REQUIREMENTS, WHICH INCLUDES: MSE&CRI MISSILES, LMKS AND OTHER GROUND SUPPORT FOR PATRIOT/PAC-3 WEAPON.
Key points
- Obligated value is about $4.583 billion; the recipient is Lockheed Martin, the branch is the Army, and the period runs December 2018 to March 2027.
- The description reads FY19/20 US/FMS REQUIREMENTS, gathering U.S. and foreign government procurement into one contract.
- Foreign military sales is the arrangement under which a foreign government purchases through the United States government, which becomes the contracting party.
- Higher volume can lower unit cost, while priority of supply and delivery schedules becomes a question spanning countries.
- Of the 207 defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-09-02, 40 carry the Army as branch against 77 for the Navy.
1What two letters signal
US/FMS in the description refers to requirements of the United States itself and to foreign military sales — the arrangement under which a foreign government purchases equipment through the United States government. Under it, the U.S. government becomes the contracting party and signs with the manufacturer. This contract therefore holds both what U.S. forces will use and what other countries are buying.
2What building them together means
Higher production volume spreads fixed costs and can lower unit price. For the United States that restrains its own procurement cost; for the purchasing side it means acquiring product from the same line as U.S. forces. At the same time, folding foreign purchases into U.S. production planning makes priority of supply and delivery schedules a question spanning countries.
3Where an Army contract sits
Among the records this site holds as of 2026-09-02, 40 carry the Army as branch, fewer than the Navy 77. Long shipbuilding contracts weight toward the Navy, while Army procurement centers on missiles and vehicles that turn over faster — a pattern visible in the distribution of durations.
4A record that retains information
The description here carries the contract number, the item, the fiscal years, the procurement category and even the model designations of what is included. Among the defense contract records this site covers, where description fields are frequently code strings or empty, this is among those from which content can be read. Record detail varies greatly by contract and does not track the size of the value.
Why it matters
United States defense procurement records carry demand from other countries within them. Reading an obligated value as U.S. defense spending counts amounts borne by foreign governments as well.
FAQ
What data is this?
What is foreign military sales?
Is the amount final?
Sources (primary)
This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.
- USAspending (award details)
- Contract ID (PIID):W31P4Q19C0011