A $4.4 billion Missile Defense Agency contract — one of seven, with an outlay ratio of 5.6 percent
A Missile Defense Agency contract with Boeing carrying an obligated value of about $4.443 billion. The description reads GBI/AUR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SYSTEMS ENG, which reads as program management and systems engineering around the Ground-Based Interceptor. Total outlays on the record are about $250.8 million, a ratio of 5.6 percent against obligation.
Contract key facts
- RecipientBoeing
- Contract value$4,442,841,235 (≈$4.44B)
- BranchDefense-wide
- Awarding agencyDepartment of Defense
- Awarding sub-agencyMissile Defense Agency
- Award typeDEFINITIVE CONTRACT
- Period of performance2019-03-18 〜 2029-03-31
- Contract ID (PIID)HQ014719C0004
Contract scope (original)
GBI/AUR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SYSTEMS ENG
Key points
- Obligated value is about $4.443 billion; the recipient is The Boeing Company and the awarding component is the Missile Defense Agency.
- Total outlays on the record are about $250.8 million, a ratio of 5.6 percent against obligation.
- Of the 207 records this site holds as of 2026-09-02, 115 show zero outlays and the 92 with outlays have a median ratio of 1 percent.
- The description reads GBI/AUR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SYSTEMS ENG, relating to the Ground-Based Interceptor.
- The Missile Defense Agency appears as awarding component on 7 records, with the branch field reading defense-wide.
1Among the minority with outlays recorded
Of the 207 defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-09-02, 115 (56 percent) show zero outlays. Even among the 92 with outlays recorded, the ratio against obligation has a median of 1 percent. This contract shows about $250.8 million in outlays, a ratio of 5.6 percent. By amount and by ratio it sits among the records where spending has progressed furthest.
2Placing the figures
The record gives no reason for the relatively high ratio. That the contract began in 2019 and seven years have passed, and that program management and systems engineering are services paid out year by year as labor rather than delivered as equipment, are plausible background — but neither can be read directly from the record.
3A description written in abbreviations
GBI/AUR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SYSTEMS ENG reads as program management and systems engineering relating to the Ground-Based Interceptor and the All-Up Round. Among the defense contract records this site covers, where description fields are often code strings or empty, this is a case where abbreviations still leave a handle on the content.
4The Missile Defense Agency as an awarding component
The Missile Defense Agency develops and deploys ballistic missile defense across the services. In the records this site holds as of 2026-09-02 it appears as the awarding component on 7 contracts, against 77 for the Navy, 43 for the Defense Contract Management Agency, 40 for the Army and 31 for the Air Force.
The branch field reads defense-wide, showing on the record itself that this is a cross-cutting program not belonging to a single service.
Why it matters
Ballistic missile defense is procured as a cross-service program. That equipment delivery and service provision may accumulate outlays differently is a handle for reading the character of a contract.
FAQ
What data is this?
Why is the outlay ratio high?
Is the amount final?
Sources (primary)
This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.
- USAspending (award details)
- Contract ID (PIID):HQ014719C0004