≈$4.65B Navy DEFINITIVE CONTRACT N0001919C0010

A ~$4.65B contract that begins before the price is settled — the undefinitized contract action (Lockheed Martin, Navy)

Department of the Navy 2018-11-15 〜 2027-04-01

A Navy contract to Lockheed Martin is scoped as "DUAL CAPABLE AIRCRAFT UCA AWARD," valued at about $4.65 billion. In defense acquisition, UCA is used as shorthand for a contract action authorizing work to begin before price and terms are settled — chosen when speed matters, at the cost of negotiating price afterwards.

Contract key facts

  • RecipientLockheed Martin
  • Contract value$4,652,509,157 (≈$4.65B)
  • BranchNavy
  • Awarding agencyDepartment of Defense
  • Awarding sub-agencyDepartment of the Navy
  • Award typeDEFINITIVE CONTRACT
  • Period of performance2018-11-15 〜 2027-04-01
  • Contract ID (PIID)N0001919C0010

Contract scope (original)

DUAL CAPABLE AIRCRAFT UCA AWARD

Key points

  • The Navy awarded Lockheed Martin a contract scoped "DUAL CAPABLE AIRCRAFT UCA AWARD," valued at about $4.65 billion ($4,652,509,157 cumulative).
  • In defense acquisition UCA is shorthand for an undefinitized contract action — work authorized before price and terms are settled.
  • The benefit is time, used where delay itself costs money or capability.
  • The cost is bargaining position: at definitization, costs are already incurred, so a deadline and a spending cap are customarily imposed.
  • Period November 15, 2018 to April 1, 2027; recorded outlays about $189.77 million. Aircraft type and work are not in the scope.
  • A UCA lets work start sooner, but cost is incurred before the price is settled, weakening the buyer at the table.

1The abbreviation UCA

In defense acquisition, UCA is used as shorthand for an undefinitized contract action — an arrangement authorizing work to begin before price and terms are settled. Ordinary procurement agrees scope and price before a contract is signed. But waiting to start can miss an operational requirement, or the scope itself may still be under negotiation. In those cases a ceiling is set, work begins, and the price is definitized afterwards.

2What is being borrowed against

The benefit of this form is time. Responding to a design change, an urgent modification, or securing a supply chain are all situations where the delay itself costs money or capability. There is a price for it. Work advancing before the price is set means that, at the moment of negotiation, costs have already been incurred, which weakens the government's bargaining position.

That is why such actions customarily carry constraints — a deadline for definitization, and a cap on the share that may be spent before it.

3What the record shows

The value is about $4.65 billion cumulative, and the period runs from November 2018 to April 2027. Recorded outlays are about $189.77 million, but public outlay fields can be incompletely recorded and cannot be read as an execution rate. The scope is one line, with no aircraft type, no description of the work, and no date of definitization. This site does not write beyond what is recorded.

4Buying time and giving up negotiating position

What this form buys is time. Answering a design change, an urgent modification, securing supply — there are many situations in which the delay itself is the loss of money or capability. That time comes at a price.

What a UCA gainsWhat a UCA costs
Work can begin without waitingCost is incurred before the price is settled
Design changes and urgent modifications stay on scheduleAt the point of negotiation, money already spent exists
Supply can be locked in earlyThe buyer's negotiating position weakens
The loss from a delayed start is avoidedDeadlines for definitization and ceilings on pre-definitization spending become necessary

That is why such actions customarily carry limits on when they must be definitized and on the share that may be spent before then. It is easy to be drawn to the size of an amount, but whether that figure is an agreed price or a ceiling set before negotiation makes it a different thing entirely.

Why it matters

Whether a contract value is an agreed price or a pre-negotiation ceiling changes what the number means. A scope carrying "UCA" signals the price may not have been settled at signature, so comparisons of amounts need to look at how the contract came about. For the contractor, work can start earlier, but cost control up to definitization drives profit, and the ability to substantiate actual costs becomes bargaining power.

FAQ

What data is this?
A single Department of Defense (DoD) federal procurement contract recorded in "USAspending," the U.S. open government-spending dataset. The recipient, awarding component, value, and scope are public. This site is not an official U.S. government website.
Is the amount final?
It is a cumulative figure as of collection. Large defense contracts accumulate modifications over many years, so amounts change. The latest figure is available at the source, USAspending.
What is a UCA?
In defense acquisition, shorthand for an undefinitized contract action — a contract authorizing work to begin before price and terms are settled, with a ceiling set and the price definitized afterwards.
Why start without a price?
Because waiting can miss an operational requirement, or the scope itself may still be under negotiation. It is used where the delay in starting is itself a cost in money or capability.

Sources (primary)

This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.

#Defense#DoD#Navy#Contract types#UCA#Undefinitized#Federal contracts
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.