≈$3.38B Navy DEFINITIVE CONTRACT N0002419C2114

About $3.38B to Bechtel Plant Machinery — the description reads Naval Reactors and nothing more, over a period of nearly fourteen years

Department of the Navy 2018-11-30 〜 2032-09-30

A definitive contract administered by the Navy whose description reads only Naval Reactors. Obligations are about $3,376.28 million over a period from 2018-11-30 to 2032-09-30, close to fourteen years. What is being delivered cannot be read from the record.

Contract key facts

  • RecipientBECHTEL PLANT MACHINERY, INC.
  • Contract value$3,376,284,837 (≈$3.38B)
  • BranchNavy
  • Awarding agencyDepartment of Defense
  • Awarding sub-agencyDepartment of the Navy
  • Award typeDEFINITIVE CONTRACT
  • Period of performance2018-11-30 〜 2032-09-30
  • Contract ID (PIID)N0002419C2114

Contract scope (original)

NAVAL REACTORS

Key points

  • The description reads Naval Reactors and nothing more; whether equipment, components or services are delivered cannot be read.
  • Of the 207 Department of Defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-09-01, 41 have a description of twenty characters or fewer and 15 hold nothing.
  • The period runs from 2018-11-30 to 2032-09-30, close to fourteen years, above the median of 10.7 years across those 207.
  • Nuclear propulsion plant runs a long sequence from design to entry into service, which the contract period reflects.
  • Those 207 records carry 50 recipient names and 74 identifiers, and neither alone collapses to a company.
  • Nuclear propulsion runs years from design to service, giving a period near fourteen years while the description holds two words.

1Two words and nothing else

The description holds two words, Naval Reactors. That the contract concerns reactors used for ship propulsion can be read; whether equipment, components or services are being delivered cannot.

Of the 207 Department of Defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-09-01, 41 have a description of twenty characters or fewer, and 15 hold nothing at all. Even at a scale of billions of dollars, records whose content cannot be read are not unusual.

2The length of the period reflects the subject

The period runs from 2018-11-30 to 2032-09-30, close to fourteen years. Across the 207 Department of Defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-09-01, the median period is 10.7 years, with 122 running ten years or more.

Nuclear propulsion plant takes a long time from design through manufacture, installation and entry into service. A long contract period reflects that sequence, and the record looks different from procurement of an existing product bought by quantity.

3The recipient name hints at a corporate group

The recipient name contains that of a well-known construction and engineering firm. Among the 207 Department of Defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-09-01, other entities under apparently related names also appear.

The record, however, explains no relationship between companies. Similar names do not establish the same party, and different names do not rule it out. Those 207 records carry 50 distinct recipient names and 74 identifiers, and neither alone collapses to a company. Tracing a corporate group requires information from outside the record.

4The record reads differently from buying off the shelf

The description holds two words: naval reactors. Even where the sum runs to billions, records from which the content cannot be read are not unusual — and that relates to the nature of the subject.

Buying a catalogue item by quantityProcuring nuclear propulsion
Scale follows quantity and unit priceDesign, manufacture, installation and entry into service take years
The contract ends at deliveryThe period runs close to fourteen years
What was bought can be read from the recordTwo words, saying neither equipment nor part nor service
Specifications are often publishedThe specifications themselves do not sit well in public

Of the 207 Department of Defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-09-01, 41 have a description of twenty characters or fewer and 15 hold nothing at all. The recipient name contains that of a well-known construction and engineering firm, but the record does not explain relationships between companies. Following a corporate group takes information from outside the record.

Why it matters

The shorter the description, the more amount and period are all there is to work with. Length of period is usable for telling whether a subject carries a long sequence of work. Tracing a corporate group takes more than recipient names and identifiers in public data; it needs outside sources.

FAQ

What is being delivered?
The description holds two words, and whether equipment, components or services are involved is not recorded.
Why a period of fourteen years?
Nuclear propulsion plant takes a long time from design through manufacture, installation and entry into service. The record gives no reason itself.
Can a corporate group be read from the record?
No. The record explains no relationship between companies, and tracing one requires information from outside it.

Sources (primary)

This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.

#Defense#Contracts#Navy#Nuclear propulsion#Data quality
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.