≈$1.6M DEFINITIVE CONTRACT HR001126CE030

Two firms starting the same programme on the same day - SABER, securing the robustness of battlefield AI (BAE Systems, about $1.65 million)

Department of Defense 2026-02-01 〜 2028-01-31

A DARPA contract to BAE Systems obligating about $1,647,757, under a programme securing the robustness of AI used on the battlefield. Another firm is running the same programme from the same start date.

Contract key facts

  • RecipientBAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION & ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC
  • Contract value$1,647,757 (≈$1.6M)
  • Awarding agencyDepartment of Defense
  • Awarding sub-agencyDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Award typeDEFINITIVE CONTRACT
  • Period of performance2026-02-01 〜 2028-01-31
  • Contract ID (PIID)HR001126CE030

Contract scope (original)

SECURING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR BATTLEFIELD EFFECTIVE ROBUSTNESS

Key points

  • Robustness covers both withstanding accidental input and noise and withstanding interference an adversary sets deliberately.
  • Of the 222 records this site holds as of 2026-09-02, two touch this programme, both starting 1 February 2026.
  • The other is about $2,313,263 to Lockheed Martin, a factor of 1.4 above this contract at about $1.65 million.
  • Whether the difference follows from scope or from the scale of the proposal is not stated in the record.
  • DARPA running several teams on one question also appears in SAIL-ON (seven), AIR (four) and PTG (three).
  • Resistance to adversarial attack is shared with civilian AI in autonomous driving and critical infrastructure control.

1What robustness means here

Robustness here covers both holding performance under unexpected input and noise, and withstanding interference an adversary sets deliberately. The first arises by chance; the second is worked at by someone probing for the weakness. In a battlefield environment, the second is the premise.

2The same programme run by two firms from the same day

RecipientAmount and period
BAE Systems (this contract)about $1,647,757, 1 Feb 2026 - 31 Jan 2028
Lockheed Martinabout $2,313,263, starting the same 1 February 2026

Of the records this site holds as of 2026-09-02, two touch this programme and both begin on the same date. DARPA setting several teams on one research question at once appears also in SAIL-ON (seven firms), AIR (four) and PTG (three), covered elsewhere on this site. At the research stage no one knows in advance which line will succeed, so running them in parallel is itself the method.

3The difference in amount need not mean anything

The two amounts, about $1.65 million and about $2.31 million, differ by a factor of 1.4. The record does not say whether that follows from a difference in scope or in the scale of what was proposed. What can be read is that two firms took up the same programme from the same day, each with a two-year period.

  1. 1Run several teams at onceContracts of a few million dollars are the entrance
  2. 2Judge the resultsWhich line succeeds is sieved here
  3. 3Grow, or endSuccess grows into a large programme; failure ends quietly

Placing AI in the harsh, unpredictable environment of a battlefield surfaces weaknesses peacetime testing did not show. If an AI carrying a judgement malfunctions under attack or disruption, the consequence is serious. Resistance to adversarial attack is a problem shared with civilian AI in autonomous driving and critical infrastructure control.

Why it matters

Resistance to adversarial attack becomes a condition of acceptance as AI enters operation. Questions raised first in defense research descend in the same shape to autonomous driving, finance and critical infrastructure control. Procurement that runs several teams at once keeps a plan alive even where part of it misses, which from the supply side means a small entry contract can still lead somewhere large.

FAQ

What is SABER?
The programme named in the description, Securing Artificial Intelligence for Battlefield Effective Robustness: AI that withstands both unexpected input and deliberate interference.
Are there other contracts under the same programme?
Of the 222 records this site holds as of 2026-09-02, two, the other being about $2,313,263 to Lockheed Martin.
Why award two firms at once?
The record gives no reason. At the research stage no one knows in advance which line will succeed, and running teams in parallel is widely seen at DARPA.

Sources (primary)

This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.

#federal spending#USAspending#DARPA#adversarial attack#robustness#BAE Systems
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.