Medical-AI trial: predicting high/low risk and subtype of basal cell carcinoma from dermoscopy images with a CNN — compared with dermatologists (NCT07677124)
A retrospective observational study evaluating whether a convolutional neural network (CNN) can classify basal cell carcinoma (BCC) as low- or high-risk and predict its histopathological subtype from clinical and dermoscopy images, and compares the model with dermatologists. Histopathology is the reference. Target 2,500; recruiting.
Trial overview (primary data)
- StatusRecruiting
- ConditionsBasal Cell Carcinoma
- SponsorIstanbul Training and Research Hospital
- Target enrollment2,500 participants
- Period2026-05-22 〜 2027-05-22
Key points
- A retrospective observational study of a CNN classifying BCC as low/high-risk and predicting histopathological subtype from dermoscopy and clinical images.
- Primary objective is low/high-risk classification performance; secondary is subtype prediction and comparison with dermatologists.
- Cases are histopathologically confirmed BCC from a dermatology archive, with pathology as the ground truth.
- BCC is the most common skin cancer; identifying a high-risk subtype bears on excision margin and surgical approach.
- Target 2,500; recruiting. A retrospective performance study, not a replacement for pathology or an establishment of clinical use.
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer; most grow slowly, but if neglected or incompletely removed they can spread deeply in one area. Planning treatment hinges on distinguishing a higher-grade subtype (high-risk) from a lower one (low-risk). Dermatologists use dermoscopy, a tool that magnifies the skin to see patterns below the surface, but the final subtype is confirmed by pathology of a biopsy.
This study examines whether that distinction can be supported from images. Per the registry summary, it uses clinical photographs and dermoscopy images with a CNN (a deep-learning method strong at image recognition) to evaluate, as the primary objective, the performance of classifying BCC as low- or high-risk.
Secondarily, it predicts the histopathological subtype and compares the model with the assessments of dermatology physicians. Cases are histopathologically confirmed BCC from a dermatology archive, with pathology as the reference standard. It is retrospective, with a target of 2,500, and it is recruiting.
If a high-risk subtype can be anticipated from dermoscopy images before biopsy, it could help plan the excision margin and surgical approach (for example, a technique that checks the borders carefully). Comparing against dermatologists positions AI as an aid to clinical judgment rather than a replacement. That said, this is a retrospective diagnostic-performance study; it does not replace pathology or establish clinical use.
Why it matters
Anticipating a high-risk subtype from images before biopsy could aid planning of excision margins and surgical approach. Comparing against dermatologists is a useful way to evaluate imaging AI as an aid (this trial is a retrospective performance study, not an establishment of clinical use).
FAQ
What is dermoscopy?
Does the AI replace a biopsy (pathology)?
Sources (primary)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (U.S. NIH/NLM, public domain). This site does not provide medical advice. Verify the latest and exact details with the official source. This site is not endorsed or certified by the NIH/NLM.
- ClinicalTrials.gov (study record, original)
- NCT ID: NCT07677124