≈$3.36B Navy DEFINITIVE CONTRACT N0002424C2301

An ending that sits on no calendar line: 17 January 2036

Department of the Navy 2024-09-09 〜 2036-01-17

A Navy contract with NASSCO worth about $3.36 billion. It ends on 17 January 2036, neither a month-end nor a quarter-end. Sixty-nine of the 208 records take this shape.

Contract key facts

  • RecipientNATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING COMPANY
  • Contract value$3,364,669,843 (≈$3.36B)
  • BranchNavy
  • Awarding agencyDepartment of Defense
  • Awarding sub-agencyDepartment of the Navy
  • Award typeDEFINITIVE CONTRACT
  • Period of performance2024-09-09 〜 2036-01-17
  • Contract ID (PIID)N0002424C2301

Contract scope (original)

T-AO 214 - 221 DD&C BLOCK BUY

Key points

  • Signed by the Department of the Navy on 9 September 2024 for about $3.36 billion, ending 17 January 2036, a period of 11.4 years.
  • Of the 208 Defense Department contracts this site holds as of 2026-09-06, 69 (33.2%) end on a day that is not the last of its month.
  • The description covers eight hulls, numbers 214 through 221, ordered as one block.
  • The outlay field is empty, so no payment against the roughly $3.36 billion obligated appears in the record.

1Off the ruled lines

This series has watched endings gather: 34 on 30 September, 85 on quarter-ends, 139 on the last day of a month. It closes by looking outside them. This contract ends on 17 January 2036not a month-end, not a quarter-end, not a year-end, simply 17 January.

Ends on the last day of a month139 / 208
Ends on some other day69 / 208

The counts come from the 208 Defense Department contracts this site holds as of 2026-09-06. One contract in three closes off the ruled lines. Aligning to the calendar is a strong habit, not a rule.

2Where the lines are missed, something else is speaking

Value of this contractabout $3.36 billion157th of the 208
Period9 September 2024 to 17 January 203611.4 years
Outlaysno recordthe field is empty

Where an ending on a year boundary reflects the budget, a date off the ruled lines is more likely to reflect the work itself. For a contract building eight ships in sequence, an awkward date for the last delivery is entirely natural, and 11.4 years reads as the time to accumulate those hulls. The record does not say so, however. What can be read is only that the date is not aligned.

3Ordering ships together

"BLOCK BUY" in the description means several ships ordered as one package. Hulls 214 through 221eight of them — sit inside a single contract. Hull 205 of the same class is covered by a separate contract here, for the detail design and construction of one ship. Ordering one at a time and ordering in a block appear side by side for the same class.

Why it matters

Contract dates are settled by two forces: the budget calendar and the work itself. Dates that do not line up are the place to look for circumstances specific to one contract.

FAQ

What does an unaligned end date mean?
The record gives no reason. Because the date does not follow the budget calendar, it may reflect the expected course of the work itself, but that cannot be asserted from the data.
What changes when ships are ordered as a block?
In the data, several ships sit inside one record. Per-ship amounts and schedules are not separated out here.
Why does the period run 11.4 years?
The record does not say. For a contract building several ships in sequence, the time to the last delivery becomes the length of the whole contract.

Sources (primary)

This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.

#Defense contracts#Department of the Navy#Shipbuilding#Contract period#Reading the data
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.