≈$4.46B Navy DEFINITIVE CONTRACT N0002411C2301

Two words of description, outlays at 2.5% of the obligation: $4.46 billion in shipbuilding

Department of the Navy 2010-12-29 〜 2024-03-28

A Navy contract signed in December 2010 and closed on 28 March 2024, obligating about $4.46 billion. Its description reads BASIC CONTRACT, and the outlay field holds about $110 million — 2.5% of the obligation.

Contract key facts

  • RecipientAUSTAL USA, LLC
  • Contract value$4,462,893,977 (≈$4.46B)
  • BranchNavy
  • Awarding agencyDepartment of Defense
  • Awarding sub-agencyDepartment of the Navy
  • Award typeDEFINITIVE CONTRACT
  • Period of performance2010-12-29 〜 2024-03-28
  • Contract ID (PIID)N0002411C2301

Contract scope (original)

BASIC CONTRACT

Key points

  • Signed by the Department of the Navy on 29 December 2010 and closed on 28 March 2024 for about $4.46 billion.
  • The description is two words, BASIC CONTRACT, and never states the subject of the award.
  • The outlay field holds about $110.3 million, 2.5% of the obligated amount.
  • Across the 41 finished contracts with positive outlays, the median ratio is 0.35% and the maximum 21.5%.

1The number is there, and it is still small

Through the previous article the outlay field was blank or zero. This contract carries a number: about $110.3 million. The obligation is about $4.46 billion.

Amount obligatedabout $4.46 billion29 December 2010 to 28 March 2024
Outlays recordedabout $110.3 million2.5% of the obligation
DescriptionBASIC CONTRACTtwo words

2Even where a number exists, the ratio is small

Forty-one finished contracts carry a positive outlay figure. Comparing outlays with obligations across those 41 gives this:

MeasureValue
Median0.35%
Ninetieth percentile3.27%
Maximum21.5%
Records above 50%0

Not one of the 41 reaches half of its obligation. At 2.5%, this contract sits toward the high end of that group.

3When the description runs to two words

Basic contract names a contracting form, not a subject. What was built cannot be read from this field. What can be read is that the Navy placed the order, that the recipient is Austal USA, LLC, and that the period ran a little over thirteen years.

The next article takes up the one description that says what the work is, with outlays still below one per cent.

Why it matters

Even where the outlay field carries a number, the ratio to the obligation is usually below one per cent. Using this field to assess budget execution leads to wrong conclusions; use obligated amounts to compare scale.

FAQ

If outlays are 2.5% of the obligation, was the contract left unperformed?
That does not follow. The outlay field carries what the record holds and is not a complete account of payment.
What is a basic contract?
It names a contracting form rather than a subject. The record does not allow the subject of this award to be identified.
Is comparing these ratios across contracts useful?
As a rough measure of how complete a record is, yes. As a comparison of actual payments, no.

Sources (primary)

This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.

#Defense contracts#Department of the Navy#Contract closeout#Outlays#Reading the data
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.