≈$4.29B Air Force DEFINITIVE CONTRACT FA880214C0001

About $4.29B for a federally funded research and development center — an arrangement relying on an organization that is neither a company nor a government agency (The Aerospace Corporation, Air Force)

Department of the Air Force 2013-10-01 〜 2019-01-19

A contract between the Air Force and The Aerospace Corporation as a federally funded research and development center (FFRDC). The description gives the period as 1 October 2013 to 30 September 2018. Of the 207 Department of Defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-08-31, this is the only record touching an FFRDC.

Contract key facts

  • RecipientTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATION
  • Contract value$4,288,177,894 (≈$4.29B)
  • BranchAir Force
  • Awarding agencyDepartment of Defense
  • Awarding sub-agencyDepartment of the Air Force
  • Award typeDEFINITIVE CONTRACT
  • Period of performance2013-10-01 〜 2019-01-19
  • Contract ID (PIID)FA880214C0001

Contract scope (original)

IGF::CL::IGF AEROSPACE FFRDC CONTRACT FROM 1 OCT 2013 TO 30 SEPT 2018

Key points

  • A contract between the Air Force and The Aerospace Corporation as a federally funded research and development center, with a cumulative amount of about $4.29 billion.
  • An FFRDC is run on government money without being a government agency, and because it does not sell products it can assess technology neutrally.
  • The string IGF::CL::IGF opening the description is a classification notation used inside government procurement, not an explanation for a reader.
  • The description gives a period of 1 October 2013 to 30 September 2018, aligned to the US fiscal year; the recorded end date is 19 January 2019.
  • Of the 207 Department of Defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-08-31, this is the only record touching an FFRDC.
  • Of the 207 Department of Defense contracts held as of 2026-08-31, this is the only one touching an FFRDC.

1A vessel that is neither company nor government

A federally funded research and development center is an organization run on government money that is not itself a government agency. Unlike a company it is not positioned to sell a particular product, and unlike a government agency it has latitude in hiring and operation. When a government needs technical advice, having the company that sells the equipment provide it creates a conflict of interest.

The design is to fund an organization capable of neutral technical assessment while keeping it outside. This contract is payment for that relationship itself.

2A machine prefix left in the description

The description opens with the string IGF::CL::IGF. That is a classification notation used inside government procurement, not an explanation written for a reader. Public data sometimes carries such processing symbols through unchanged. Among the records this site holds are descriptions filled with modification numbers and accounting identifiers.

The character showing through such notation is that a published description was never written as an account for outsiders; it is an internal record surfacing as it stands.

3Five years of a relationship in one contract

The period the description gives runs from 1 October 2013 to 30 September 2018, five years aligned to the US fiscal year. The recorded end date is later, 19 January 2019. Unlike a contract to build a particular piece of equipment, this covers a relationship of technical support over a period.

Of the 207 records this site holds as of 2026-08-31, only this one touches an FFRDC, making it a different character of spending among rows of equipment procurement.

Contracts touching an FFRDC1of the 207 held as of 2026-08-31
Period given in the description5 years1 Oct 2013 to 30 Sep 2018, aligned to the fiscal year
Recorded end date19 Jan 2019later than the description

Why it matters

Taking technical advice from whoever sells the technology creates a conflict of interest. Funding a neutral assessor and keeping it outside appears as spending distinct from equipment procurement. Public descriptions can also carry internal processing symbols, so they have to be read on the premise that they were never written as an account for outsiders.

FAQ

What is an FFRDC?
A federally funded research and development center: an organization run on government money that is not itself a government agency, and which can assess technology neutrally because it does not sell products.
What is IGF::CL::IGF?
A classification notation used inside government procurement, not an explanation written for a reader. Public data sometimes carries such processing symbols through unchanged.
What is delivered under this contract?
No deliverable is written in the record. It covers a relationship of technical support over a period rather than building a particular piece of equipment.

Sources (primary)

This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.

#Defense#Department of Defense#Air Force#Research institutions#Procurement
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.