About $8.95B to KBR — the contract number is the four-digit 0159, and the description is one sentence saying the follow-on to 139 became 159 (Army, ended 2012)
A delivery order awarded by the Army to KBR. Obligations total about $8,949.37 million and the period ran from 2008-09-24 to 2012-09-30. The contract number is the four-digit 0159, and the description says only that it is the follow-on to an earlier task order.
Contract key facts
- RecipientKBR
- Contract value$8,949,368,389 (≈$8.95B)
- BranchArmy
- Awarding agencyDepartment of Defense
- Awarding sub-agencyDepartment of the Army
- Award typeDELIVERY ORDER
- Period of performance2008-09-24 〜 2012-09-30
- Contract ID (PIID)0159
Contract scope (original)
FOLLOW ON TASK ORDER TO 139 IS NOW TASK ORDER 159
Key points
- The contract number 0159 has four digits because it is the running number of an individual order under a parent contract.
- Of the 207 Department of Defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-08-31, 14 are delivery orders and 193 are definitive contracts.
- The description is the single sentence that the follow-on task order to 139 is now task order 159; the content of the order is absent.
- The period ran from 2008-09-24 to 2012-09-30 and has ended, yet outlays are recorded as zero.
- Of the same 207, outlays are zero on 115 and 62 of those are past their end date.
- Of the 207 Department of Defense contracts held as of 2026-08-31, outlays are zero on 115, and 62 of those are past their end date.
1Why the contract number has four digits
Federal contract numbers usually run to around thirteen alphanumeric characters, from which an awarding office code and a year can be read. This record carries only the four digits 0159, because it is the number given to an individual order issued in sequence under a parent contract.
A delivery order places individual work or goods under a framework agreed in advance, as need arises. The number is a running count within that framework, so it is short. Of the 207 Department of Defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-08-31, 14 take this form and the remaining 193 are definitive contracts.
2The description only points at an earlier number
What the description carries is the sentence that the follow-on task order to 139 is now task order 159. Not what was ordered, but only the connection to the order before it.
Where ordering continues under a framework, individual orders are sometimes treated as continuations. The record shows the continuity while leaving what was done on that occasion unreadable. Nothing short of matching it against the other orders from the same framework gives the whole picture.
3More than a decade after it ended, outlays are still zero
The period ran from 2008-09-24 to 2012-09-30 and has ended. Outlays are nonetheless recorded as zero.
Of the 207 Department of Defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-08-31, outlays are zero on 115, and 62 of those are past their end date as this one is. Ended and at zero cannot be explained by payment still to come. The outlay value is more accurately read as reflecting the reporting arrangement rather than the state of the contract. Obligations, for their part, are recorded here at about $8,949.37 million.
Why it matters
Agreeing a framework first and ordering against it as need arises is widespread in public procurement. Seen from outside, the money appears split across individual orders, so a single record shows neither the scale nor the content. The digit count of the number and the award type are the first clue as to whether a record is part of a framework or a contract standing alone.
FAQ
Why is the contract number four digits?
Why are outlays zero on an ended contract?
What did the order buy?
Sources (primary)
This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.
- USAspending (award details)
- Contract ID (PIID):0159