About $3.11M to CalNet — a base year plus three option years, with outlays recorded as minus $143
A definitive contract awarded by the Army. The description records a structure of a base year plus three option years. Obligations are about $3,108,058 while outlays are recorded as minus $143. Of the 222 federal spending records this site holds as of 2026-09-01, this is the only one whose outlays are a negative value.
Contract key facts
- RecipientCALNET INC
- Contract value$3,108,058 (≈$3.1M)
- Awarding agencyDepartment of Defense
- Awarding sub-agencyDepartment of the Army
- Award typeDEFINITIVE CONTRACT
- Period of performance2023-05-23 〜 2026-07-31
- Contract ID (PIID)W911QX23C0003
Contract scope (original)
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE/MACHINE LEARNING - BASE YEAR PLUS THREE (3) OPTION YEARS
Key points
- Outlays are recorded as minus $143, the only negative value among the 222 federal spending records this site holds as of 2026-09-01.
- Across the 207 Department of Defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-09-01 there are three negatives, the smallest at minus $2,822,393.
- A negative can appear as a refund of overpayment or a correction to a prior year; the record gives no reason.
- The description records a base year plus three option years, with the buying side choosing whether to continue each year.
- The period runs three years and two months, shorter than the four years the structure would give.
1Outlays recorded as a negative value
Outlays are recorded as minus $143. Of the 222 federal spending records this site holds as of 2026-09-01, this is the only one with a negative value. Across the 207 Department of Defense contracts this site holds as of 2026-09-01 there are three, the smallest at minus $2,822,393.
The record gives no reason. In accounting treatment, a refund of overpayment or a correction to a prior year can appear as a negative. Either way it shows that the outlay field is not a simple running total but a value carrying corrections. Summing the field without thought lets such values in.
2A structure of base and option years
The description records a base year plus three option years: the first year is contracted as the base, and for each year after, the buying side chooses whether to continue.
Seen from the supplier, four years of work is not assured; each year brings a decision. Seen from the buyer, weak results can be cut short, while the absence of a long horizon can make the supplier cautious about investing. Of the 222 federal spending records this site holds as of 2026-09-01, four descriptions touch on this structure.
3A period of three years and two months
The period runs from 2023-05-23 to 2026-07-31, 1,165 days or three years and two months, shorter than the four years a base year plus three options would give. Whether some option was not exercised, or the period is simply recorded differently, cannot be read from the record.
Across the 222 federal spending records this site holds as of 2026-09-01 the median period is 2.00 years, so this contract runs on the longer side. It reads as a case where the contract structure and the recorded period do not line up.
Why it matters
An option-year structure leaves the buyer room to stop while making the supplier cautious about investing. Where work needs long-lived equipment or staff, that asymmetry bears on practice. That outlays can carry negative values is worth holding in mind before summing a public dataset.
FAQ
What do negative outlays mean?
What is an option year?
Why is the period under four years?
Sources (primary)
This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official spending data below. Verify the exact, latest details with the official source.
- USAspending (award details)
- Contract ID (PIID):W911QX23C0003