Encryption not applied in Apache Tomcat (CVE-2026-34486) — CISA states it can be chained with another vulnerability
Apache Tomcat contains a missing-encryption-of-sensitive-data vulnerability that allows the EncryptInterceptor to be bypassed. CISA explicitly notes that it can be chained with CVE-2025-24813, and added it to KEV on August 4, 2026 with a due date of August 7.
Key facts
- CVE IDCVE-2026-34486
- Affected (vendor / product)Apache Tomcat
- CWECWE-311
- ExploitationListed in CISA KEV (exploitation confirmed)
- Remediation due2026-08-07 (U.S. federal civilian agencies, BOD 22-01)
Key points
- Affected: Apache Tomcat. CWE-311 (missing encryption of sensitive data).
- The EncryptInterceptor for server-to-server traffic can be bypassed — traffic believed protected may travel in the clear.
- CISA explicitly states the vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2025-24813.
- A defect that looks minor on its own becomes heavier as one link in a chain.
- Added to KEV 2026-08-04 with a due date of 2026-08-07 — three days.
- Of the 1,687 records held as of 2026-09-01, only 29 mention chaining in the description.
1What the EncryptInterceptor does
Tomcat can run as a cluster of servers that exchange session information and other data among themselves. The EncryptInterceptor is the mechanism provided to encrypt that server-to-server traffic. The vulnerability here creates a state in which that encryption does not take effect — traffic you believe is protected may travel in the clear.
2What it means that chaining is stated explicitly
What stands out in the CISA entry is that it names another CVE: this vulnerability "can be chained with CVE-2025-24813." A defect whose own nature is limited to information not being protected can reach a heavier outcome when combined with something else. KEV entries rarely mention chaining, and this one is a reminder not to judge by a single vulnerability's severity alone.
3Handling things that look minor on their own
Missing encryption has no dramatic outcome such as code execution, which makes it the kind of finding that slips down a prioritized backlog. But when it functions as one link in a chain, that ordering stops matching reality. It is also worth remembering that presence in KEV is itself a record of exploitation observed in the wild.
4Few records mention chaining
What stands out in CISA's description is that it names another CVE number this vulnerability can be chained with. Records on KEV that mention chaining are not many.
An absence of encryption carries no dramatic outcome, which makes it the kind of finding that falls behind in vulnerability prioritisation. Where it functions as one link in a chain, though, that prioritisation stops matching reality. Where a cluster depends on encrypted inter-server communication, confirming the setting takes effect as intended is worth doing alongside applying the fix.
Why it matters
Prioritizing vulnerability work by single scores alone drops defects that function within a chain. A KEV entry that mentions chaining puts a concrete face on the operational question of how to assess attack paths built from several vulnerabilities. Reviewing channels assumed safe because they are internal, such as intra-cluster traffic, is part of the same point.
FAQ
What is the EncryptInterceptor?
What does "can be chained" mean?
Is missing encryption low priority?
Sources (primary)
This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official data below. Always verify the exact, latest details and applicability with the official and vendor sources.
- CISA KEV Catalog (known exploited list)
- NVD (CVE details / CVSS)
- Vendor / reference advisory
- This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. KEV data is CC0 (public domain).