Exploited Known exploited (KEV) CVE-2014-0502

A record that asks for discontinuation, not an update: 33 Flash Player entries

Adobe Flash Player Added to KEV Sep 17, 2024 Federal remediation due 2024-10-08

A double free flaw identified in 2014 was added to the catalog on 17 September 2024. What it requires is not applying an update but ceasing to use the product.

Key facts

  • CVE IDCVE-2014-0502
  • Affected (vendor / product)Adobe Flash Player
  • CWECWE-399
  • ExploitationListed in CISA KEV (exploitation confirmed)
  • Remediation due2024-10-08 (U.S. federal civilian agencies, BOD 22-01)

Key points

  • A double free flaw in Adobe Flash Player allowing remote arbitrary code execution.
  • The identifier dates from 2014 but the catalog entry from 17 September 2024, a ten-year gap.
  • The required action is discontinuation of an end-of-life product, not an update.
  • Flash Player appears 33 times, with identifier years confined to 2010 through 2018.

1A record with nothing left to fix

The previous article had a remediation instruction updated to a newer framework. This record is the reverse: the option of fixing does not exist.

Times Flash Player appears33fourth most of any product
Range of identifier years2010 to 20182015 is the largest with 10
Date added to the catalog17 September 2024ten years after the identifier

2The required action is a different kind of thing

AspectA typical recordThis record
Wording of the actionapply mitigations per vendor instructionsthe product is end-of-life; discontinue use
What the window meanstime to apply an updatetime to stop using it
Referencesupdate noticesend-of-life notice and alternatives
How completion is verifiedthe version movedthe product left the estate

Fix it by the date becomes stop using it by the date. In operational terms those are not comparable tasks. An update ends when it is applied; a retirement requires an alternative and the migration of whatever depended on the product.

3What a ten-year-old identifier means here

The identifier is from 2014 and the listing from September 2024. That gap does not mean the flaw was newly discovered. It means an old flaw was confirmed to be still in use by attackers. Where a product that is no longer supplied remains in an estate, a defect from ten years ago is still a way in.

The 33 Flash Player entries span identifier years 2010 to 2018. No new defects will be added. What remains exposed are the estates where the product is still installed.

The next article takes up a record where the party to fix it is not a single one.

Why it matters

Update coverage alone never reflects records for end-of-life products. Whether products due for retirement still exist in the estate needs a separate measure of its own.

FAQ

Why is a ten-year-old flaw listed now?
Not because it was newly found but because exploitation was confirmed to be current. Where an unsupported product remains installed, an old defect is still a way in.
Can this not be closed with an update?
There is nothing to apply. The product is end-of-life and the stated action is to stop using it.
What is a double free?
A defect in which the same region of memory is released twice. If an attacker can manipulate the released region, arbitrary code execution can follow.

Sources (primary)

This article is an independent organization based on the U.S. official data below. Always verify the exact, latest details and applicability with the official and vendor sources.

#KEV#Known exploited#Flash Player#End of life#Vulnerability management
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.