Notice 2026-13876

A hundred and fourteen days for one bridge — FHWA gives notice of an environmental impact statement in Maine

Department of Transportation Published Jul 9, 2026 91 FR 42591

On 9 July 2026 the Federal Highway Administration gave notice that an environmental impact statement would be prepared for improvements to the Machias Dike Bridge on U.S. Route 1 in Maine. Comments were due 31 October, a window of a hundred and fourteen days.

Document overview (primary data)

  • Document typeNotice
  • AgencyDepartment of Transportation
  • Citation91 FR 42591

Key points

  • The Federal Highway Administration, on behalf of the Maine Department of Transportation, gave notice that an environmental impact statement will be prepared for the Machias Dike Bridge, number 2246.
  • The bridge is built as four box culverts fitted with tide gates.
  • The public is asked what the purpose and need should be taken to be, which alternatives belong in the range weighed, and what environmental effects or difficulties the project raises.
  • Published 9 July 2026 with comments due 31 October, a window of a hundred and fourteen days, in a document of two pages.
  • Among the 2,289 documents with deadlines this site holds as of 2026-09-05, only 16 (0.7%) run to 91 days or more, and this notice is one.

1Two pages, a hundred and fourteen days

The series opened with a two page notice carrying eleven days. It closes with another two page notice carrying a hundred and fourteen. The same length, more than ten times the window. Nothing shows more plainly that page count does not set the figure.

2What is being asked

The subject is a single bridge carrying U.S. Route 1 through Machias, Maine, built as four box culverts fitted with tide gates. What the notice asks of the public is what the purpose and need should be taken to be, and which alternatives belong in the range weighed, along with any environmental effects or difficulties the project raises.

The aspectComment on a proposed ruleComment on this notice of intent
What is askedWhether the proposal put forward is rightWhat the purpose should be and which alternatives belong in scope
The momentAfter a proposal has taken shapeBefore it has
Role of the commentTo alter the proposalTo shape the frame of the study itself
The window here114 days, published 9 July 2026, closing 31 October 2026

Comment is being sought before anything is settled, and that is the reason for the long window. What the project is for, and which alternatives get onto the table, are decided here; whatever is missed at this stage is hard to raise later.

3Local decisions need time too

Documents carrying a comment deadline among the 7,106 records this site holds as of 2026-09-052,289A median of 32 days
Of those, windows of 91 days or more160.7% of the total
The window here114 daysThe longest in this series

The subject is not a national scheme but one bridge in one town, and it still draws a hundred and fourteen days. Few people being affected is not the same as little time being needed. Replacing a bridge touches commuting, fishing, the movement of the tide and the life around it, and gathering those concerns from the people who hold them takes time.

4The eight windows side by side

WindowDocumentWhat set the length
11 daysPostal Regulatory Commission, a pricing schedule filing, July 2026The issue sits in a filing already made; the judgment is whether to accept it
21 daysAgriculture, extending an RFI on modified organisms, June 2026A notice moving the deadline of a period already running, forty-six days in all
30 daysTreasury and IRS, the estate tax closing letter fee, June 2026One question, a bounded set of affected people, three pages
45 daysCFTC, public interest findings on prediction markets, June 2026Sixty-six pages, but organized into four questions
60 daysFDIC, compliance standards for stablecoin issuers, June 2026A new statute given first shape, with no precedent to reason from
91 daysJustice and ATF, fingerprints and photographs for firearms applications, July 2026Positions diverge and wide comment is expected
111 daysCopyright Office, the triennial DMCA exemption review, June 2026Two stages, petitions then comments, seventy-six plus thirty-five
114 daysTransportation and FHWA, an environmental impact statement in Maine, July 2026Purpose and alternatives are asked before anything is settled

Set out together, what emerges is that the length is set not by how much there is to read but by what a commenter has to work out. Agreeing or disagreeing with a filing already on paper takes eleven days; proposing purposes and alternatives when nothing has been decided takes a hundred and fourteen. The original is in the Federal Register.

Why it matters

What sets the length of a comment window is not the size of the document but what a commenter has to work out. Agreeing or disagreeing with a filing already on paper takes eleven days; being asked, before anything is settled, what a project is for and which alternatives belong in scope takes a hundred and fourteen. That a single local project draws the longest window in the series shows that few people affected is not the same as little time required.

FAQ

What is a notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement?
A notice letting the public know such a statement is to be drawn up for a project, and asking what its purpose and need should be taken to be and which alternatives belong in the range weighed.
Why does a two page notice carry a hundred and fourteen days?
Because it asks, before anything is settled, what the project is for and which alternatives belong in scope. Issues missed at this stage are hard to raise later.
What kind of bridge is it?
The Machias Dike Bridge, numbered 2246, carrying U.S. Route 1 through Machias, Maine, and built as four box culverts fitted with tide gates.

Sources (primary)

Source: Federal Register (federal documents, public domain). Links go to the official site.

#Federal Register#Public comment#Environmental review#United States#Rulemaking
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.