Medical-AI trial: AI-assisted "blind-sweep" obstetric ultrasound by non-specialists — antenatal screening in rural DR Congo (SPAQ E-con AI) (NCT07677670)
A multicenter prospective study evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and implementation feasibility of an AI-assisted blind-sweep obstetric ultrasound (SPAQ E-con AI), operated by trained non-specialist health workers, for antenatal screening in rural Democratic Republic of the Congo. Primary outcomes are gestational-age mean absolute error (trimesters 2 and 3) and AI confidence calibration. Target ~1,430 (IRB ceiling 3,000). Recruiting.
Trial overview (primary data)
- StatusRecruiting
- ConditionsAntenatal Care, Maternal Health, Gestational Age, Placenta Praevia, Diagnostic Imaging
- InterventionsDIAGNOSTIC_TEST: SPAQ E-con AI blind-sweep ultrasound
- SponsorSOIK Corporation Sarl
- Target enrollment3,000 participants
- Period2026-06-19 〜 2027-06-13
Key points
- An accuracy and implementation-feasibility evaluation of AI-assisted blind-sweep obstetric ultrasound (SPAQ E-con AI) operated by non-specialist health workers.
- Set in rural Democratic Republic of the Congo for antenatal screening; multicenter, prospective, recruiting.
- Primary outcomes are gestational-age mean absolute error (trimesters 2 and 3) and AI confidence calibration (expected calibration error, Brier score).
- Reference is a reference reader manual measurement (early ultrasound preferred); follows FDA PCCP and STARD-AI with a pre-specified model-update plan.
- Target ~1,430 (ceiling 3,000). An accuracy and feasibility stage, not an establishment of effectiveness or specialist replacement.
In antenatal care, ultrasound is central to knowing gestational age and the condition of the fetus and placenta, but acquiring and reading it requires trained specialists. Where specialists and equipment are scarce, the screening itself becomes hard to access. This is where the blind-sweep method draws interest: a non-specialist moves the probe in a set pattern to collect images, and AI handles the interpretation. Because a specialist does not need to aim the scan, the pool of operators can widen.
The SPAQ E-con AI that this study evaluates supports exactly this non-specialist blind-sweep obstetric ultrasound with AI. Per the registry summary, the study is set in rural Democratic Republic of the Congo, where trained non-specialist health workers perform the scans, and it evaluates diagnostic accuracy and implementation feasibility.
Primary outcomes are gestational-age mean absolute error (trimester 2, 14–27 weeks; trimester 3, 28–36 weeks) and the calibration of the AI confidence (expected calibration error and Brier score). The accuracy reference is manual measurement by a reference reader (early ultrasound preferred; manual BPD, biparietal diameter, if unavailable; last menstrual period is not used).
It is multicenter and prospective, with a Hybrid Type 1 design that examines effectiveness and field implementation together, and it follows FDA PCCP (a pre-specified post-market change plan) and STARD-AI guidance, including a pre-specified model-update (a Batch 2 cut). The target is about 1,430 (IRB-approved ceiling 3,000), with early termination allowed once pre-specified analysis thresholds are met.
The key of this trial is that it evaluates not only AI accuracy but also whether non-specialists can operate it in the field (implementation feasibility) within the same framework. Setting AI confidence calibration as a primary outcome, and following regulatory and reporting frameworks such as FDA PCCP and STARD-AI, embodies a modern discipline for using medical AI responsibly in the real world.
As an effort to bring obstetric ultrasound to areas short of specialists it is significant, but this study is an accuracy and feasibility evaluation and does not establish effectiveness or replacement of specialists.
Why it matters
Evaluating not just AI accuracy but non-specialist field operation within the same framework, with confidence calibration and adherence to FDA PCCP and STARD-AI, is an example of a modern discipline for deploying medical AI responsibly. It is a useful reference for efforts to bring obstetric care to areas short of specialists (this trial is an evaluation stage, not an establishment of effectiveness).
FAQ
What is blind-sweep ultrasound?
Is it confirmed the AI can determine gestational age correctly?
Sources (primary)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (U.S. NIH/NLM, public domain). This site does not provide medical advice. Verify the latest and exact details with the official source. This site is not endorsed or certified by the NIH/NLM.
- ClinicalTrials.gov (study record, original)
- NCT ID: NCT07677670