Medical-AI trial: easing the documentation burden with AI (Evidently) — a randomized test against clinician burnout (NCT07498582)
A randomized evaluation of whether outpatient specialists can spend less time and effort reviewing and documenting care by receiving AI-made summaries of existing medical-record information. It looks at effects on clinician workload, time in the electronic health record (EHR), and documentation experience. The primary outcome is the change in clinician cognitive load. 128 clinicians; completed.
Trial overview (primary data)
- StatusCompleted
- ConditionsBurnout, Healthcare Workers, Clinical Workflow Optimization, Health Information Technology, Electronic Health Records
- InterventionsBEHAVIORAL: AI Clinical Summarization Tool (Evidently)
- SponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Target enrollment128 participants
- Period2026-03-30 〜 2026-06-08
Key points
- A randomized evaluation of whether AI-made summaries of existing records let outpatient specialists spend less time and effort reviewing and documenting care.
- It examines effects on clinician workload, time in the electronic health record (EHR), and documentation experience.
- The primary outcome is the change in clinician cognitive load. UNC outpatient specialists; 128; completed.
- Documentation burden, via EHR review and entry, is a major driver of clinician burnout.
- AI that helps clinicians, not diagnoses patients; a load/time/experience evaluation, not an establishment of patient-outcome improvement or broad effectiveness.
In health care, documentation can take as much time as care itself. Chasing electronic health record (EHR) review and entry, with work spilling past the visit and after hours, is a major driver of clinician burnout. A growing focus is clinician-facing AI that helps the doctor, not the patient, easing documentation by summarizing record information. This study evaluates one such tool, Evidently.
Per the registry summary, this randomized evaluation tests whether an AI documentation-support tool that creates brief summaries of existing record information to support routine work can help outpatient specialists spend less time reviewing and documenting.
It examines how using the tool affects clinician workload, time in the EHR, and overall documentation experience, aiming to understand whether such AI can improve efficiency and reduce burden in outpatient specialty practice. Participants are UNC (University of North Carolina) outpatient specialists, and the primary outcome is the change in clinician cognitive load. 128 clinicians; completed.
What is distinctive is that this is not about AI diagnosing or treating disease but about AI supporting how clinicians work. Rather than competing on diagnostic accuracy, setting clinician cognitive load and EHR time, measures of workability, as the outcome reflects a view that AI value is measured not only by clinical outcomes but by clinician well-being and sustainability.
Easing clinician burden can ripple to overall care quality by curbing turnover and burnout. That said, this study evaluates load, time, and experience; it does not broadly establish improvement in patient outcomes or the tool effectiveness.
Why it matters
It reflects a view that AI value is measured not only by clinical outcomes but by clinician well-being and sustainability. Easing documentation burden can ripple to overall care quality by curbing turnover and burnout (this study evaluates load, time, and experience, not patient-outcome improvement or broad effectiveness).
FAQ
Does this AI diagnose patients?
Why use cognitive load as the primary outcome?
Sources (primary)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (U.S. NIH/NLM, public domain). This site does not provide medical advice. Verify the latest and exact details with the official source. This site is not endorsed or certified by the NIH/NLM.
- ClinicalTrials.gov (study record, original)
- NCT ID: NCT07498582