When an emergency kit is hard to press — a gliding force out of specification
A glucagon emergency kit for low blood sugar was recalled after the gliding force functionality test returned an out-of-specification result during twelve-month long-term stability testing, recorded as a CGMP deviation.
Recall overview (primary data)
- ClassificationClass II
- Product typeDrug
- Recalling firmLupin Pharmaceuticals Inc.
- ReasonCGMP deviation: OOS result observed for the Gliding Force functionality test during 12-month long term stability testing.
- DistributionNationwide within the U.S.
- Recall initiated2026-06-23
Key points
- The product is the Glucagon Emergency Kit for Low Blood Sugar, 1 mg per vial with a 1 mL syringe of diluent, NDC 70748-311-01.
- The reason is an out-of-specification result for the gliding force functionality test during twelve-month long-term stability testing.
- It is recorded as a deviation from current good manufacturing practice.
- Gliding force is the force required to depress a syringe plunger, and the emergency setting changes what that means.
- The recalling firm is Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc., the quantity 64,894 units, distributed nationwide.
1When being hard to press becomes the problem
Gliding force is the force required to depress the plunger of a syringe. For an ordinary injectable, a stiff plunger is an inconvenience and the dose still goes in. This kit, though, is for an emergency in low blood sugar. The setting in which it is used changes what stiffness means.
2Who uses it, and when
A physical property of the device takes its meaning from the urgency of the setting. Glucagon raises blood sugar and is given in severe hypoglycaemia. That context is why stiffness may amount to more than inconvenience.
3The words during twelve-month stability testing
- 1What was measuredThe gliding force functionality test
- 2WhenAt the twelve-month point of long-term stability testing
- 3The resultOut of specification
- 4How it is recordedA deviation from current good manufacturing practice
The product was not out of specification at release. The record is that testing at twelve months found it outside. Stability testing exists to confirm that a product stays within specification across its labelled period; the same structure as the shelf life in the previous article appears here as a measured value.
4The scale
The firm found it in its own testing, not through a complaint or an inspection, but within the stability programme it is required to run. Firms themselves initiate 98.8% of these recalls, and this is one of them.
Why it matters
A physical property of a device takes its meaning from the urgency of the setting it is used in. A stiff plunger may be mere inconvenience in a planned injection and an obstacle to administration itself in a hypoglycaemic emergency. Stability testing, meanwhile, exists to confirm conformity not at release but after time has passed, and this record is an instance of that mechanism doing its work.
FAQ
What is gliding force?
Why does it matter for an emergency kit?
Was it out of specification at release?
Sources (primary)
Source: openFDA (U.S. FDA, CC0 public domain). Data is provided as-is and must not be used for medical decisions. Verify the latest and exact details with the official FDA recall information. This site is not endorsed or certified by the U.S. FDA.
- FDA recall information (official)
- openFDA (data provider)
- Recall number: D-0723-2026