Class II Drug D-0643-2026 Ongoing

Unsterilized antiseptic applicators distributed (D-0643-2026) — what it means for an antiseptic to be recorded as a drug

CareFusion 213, LLC Reported Jul 8, 2026

A recall began for single-use skin antiseptic applicators after unsterilized units, intended for further processing and sterilization, reached customers outside the intended channel. The record classifies the product as a drug, and the product type field indicates which regulatory framework applies.

Recall overview (primary data)

  • ClassificationClass II
  • Product typeDrug
  • Recalling firmCareFusion 213, LLC
  • ReasonLack of assurance of sterility: Unsterilized ChloraPrep & PurPrep Applicators, intended for further processing and sterilization were instead distributed to customers outside of the intended distribution channel
  • DistributionDistributed Nationwide in the USA
  • Recall initiated2026-06-11

Key points

  • Unsterilized applicators intended for further processing and sterilization reached customers outside the intended distribution channel.
  • A single-use skin antiseptic is recorded as a drug; the product type field indicates the governing regulatory framework.
  • Of the 1,408 records this site holds as of 2026-09-04, devices number 779 (55.3%), food 341 (24.2%) and drugs 288 (20.5%).
  • None of the 288 drug records carries a stated reason longer than 250 characters, so readable detail varies by product type.
  • Because one reason splits into several records by product variant, the count of records is not the count of events.

1An antiseptic is handled as a drug

A single-use applicator for disinfecting skin looks more like a piece of equipment than a medicine, yet the record registers it as a drug, because what it holds is an active substance. The product type field indicates which regulatory framework governs the product, not what it looks like or how it is handled. The reason here is that units which had not yet been sterilized reached customers as they were. This is a product used on the assumption that it is sterile, and that assumption failed.

2Records are thicker for some product types than others

Device records among the 1,408 this site holds as of 2026-09-0477955.3% of the total, the largest share
Food records, of those same 1,40834124.2%
Drug records, of those same 1,40828820.5%

Devices are more than half by count. The length of the stated reasons differs too. Among the 288 drug records, not one carries a reason longer than 250 characters, whereas device records not uncommonly run to several hundred characters explaining how a failure arises. Inside the same category of recall information, how much can be learned varies by product type.

3One reason becomes many records

This recall is one of several records sharing a reason. Because records split by model number and packaging variant, a single event appears many times over. That matters when counting. How many recalls there were is not the same question as how many things happened. Quantities are split across those records as well, so learning the scale of an event means gathering the related records together.

4What the product type field settles

Product type is not merely a label for a field of industry. It determines the legal framework, what information gets recorded, and, as the previous article showed, how classes come out. When judging whether a recall concerns you, looking first at the product type and recalling what records in that field do and do not say is what keeps the reading straight.

Why it matters

The product type field marks which regulatory framework applies rather than which industry a product belongs to. A different framework means different amounts of recorded information and a different distribution of classes. Because one event also splits into several records by variant, counting records as events misstates what happened, which matters to anyone aggregating this data.

FAQ

Why is an antiseptic applicator a drug?
Because what it contains is an active substance. The product type field reflects the governing framework, not the form or the way it is used.
Why does one recall split into several records?
Records separate by model number and packaging variant, so counting records is not the same as counting events.
Do drug records carry less information?
Within the records held here, their stated reasons run shorter than those for devices. How thick a record is varies by product type.

Sources (primary)

Source: openFDA (U.S. FDA, CC0 public domain). Data is provided as-is and must not be used for medical decisions. Verify the latest and exact details with the official FDA recall information. This site is not endorsed or certified by the U.S. FDA.

#FDA recalls#Drugs#Sterility#Product type#United States
Disclaimer: This site independently summarizes and classifies information based on official data sources. Always verify the latest and accurate information with the official sources. Content on finance, health, legal, and security is information, not advice. This site is not an official website of the U.S. government.