NSF grant $1.8M: decoding how the living brain rewrites only the right connections — toward AI that does not forget (UC San Diego)
An NSF award of $1.8 million to UC San Diego. Today AI needs massive data, struggles to keep learning without forgetting, and relies on rules far from the brain. This project discovers the biological rules for when and where the living brain updates neural connections. An all-optical approach measures and induces plasticity in awake mice at single-cell resolution, translating selective-rewiring principles into continual-learning AI. Runs 2026-2031.
Grant overview (primary data)
- Award amount$1,800,000
- RecipientUniversity of California-San Diego (California)
- ProgramCell, Dev, & Physio
- Period2026-08-01 〜 2031-07-31
- FunderU.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) / NSF
Key points
- Recipient: UC San Diego, $1.8M, August 2026 to July 2031
- Targets AI weaknesses — data hunger, catastrophic forgetting, non-brain-like rules — via neuroscience
- Central hypothesis: efficient learning depends on rules governing when and where connection updates are permitted
- All-optical approach (two-photon imaging + single-cell holographic optogenetics + connectivity mapping) measures and induces plasticity in awake mice at single-cell resolution
- Translates biologically validated learning rules into computational models and artificial neural networks for continual learning
This award is a prime example of the two-way street between AI and neuroscience: decode the rules by which the living brain rewrites its knowledge, and translate them into design principles for AI that does not forget.
1Three weaknesses of today's AI
The starting point is a weakness of current AI. Today systems excel at many tasks but need enormous data, struggle to keep learning new information without forgetting old (continual learning), and rely on rules far from the brains. That failure — catastrophic forgetting — is a deep problem for AI running in the real world. This project goes to neuroscience for a grounded answer.
2When and where rewiring is allowed
The central hypothesis is sharp: efficient learning depends on connectivity update rules that determine not only how neural activity modifies synaptic strength, but also when and where those modifications are permitted.
The brain does not blindly rewrite every connection; it selectively modifies only the appropriate ones while preserving existing knowledge — and the rules of that selection may be the key to preventing forgetting.
3Two-photon imaging and optogenetics
The methods are ambitious. An all-optical approach combining two-photon calcium imaging (observing many neurons at once), single-cell holographic optogenetic stimulation (activating a single targeted cell with light), and functional connectivity mapping both measures and experimentally induces plasticity in awake mice at single-cell resolution.
It resolves how behavioral state, neuromodulation, and local inhibitory circuits regulate these update rules, and how network organization and the functional identity of neuronal ensembles influence which connections are rewritten.
Why it matters
Basic research approaching the deep AI challenges of continual learning and catastrophic forgetting from direct brain measurement. The two-way cycle — measure in the brain, refine the AI — is a valuable read on the intersection of AI and neuroscience for those tracking neuromorphic computing, continual learning, and brain-inspired AI.
FAQ
What is catastrophic forgetting?
Why measure in the living brain?
Will this be applied to AI immediately?
Sources (primary)
Source: NSF Award Search (U.S. National Science Foundation, public domain). Amounts are the obligated amount. For privacy, we do not handle principal investigator names.
- NSF Award (original, official)
- NSF Award ID: 2619492